Literature DB >> 19395749

Effects of management, behavior, and scavenging on risk of brucellosis transmission in elk of western Wyoming.

Eric J Maichak1, Brandon M Scurlock, Jared D Rogerson, Laura L Meadows, Andrea E Barbknecht, William H Edwards, Paul C Cross.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is endemic in elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) using winter feedgrounds of western Wyoming, USA presumably because of increased animal density, duration of attendance, and subsequent contact with aborted fetuses. However, previous research addressed antibody prevalence rather than more direct measures of transmission and did not account for elk behavior or scavenging in transmission risk. Throughout March and early April 2005-07, we monitored 48 sets of culture-negative, pseudoaborted elk fetuses, placentas, and fluids (fetal units, FUs) on one winter free-ranging (WFR) location and four sites (Feedline, High Traffic, Low Traffic, Adjacent) associated with four feedgrounds. "At-risk" elk (total elk within 5 m of FU) and proportions of elk sniffing and contacting FUs were highest on Feedlines and decreased toward Low Traffic sites. We did not observe elk investigating FUs Adjacent to feedgrounds or on the WFR location. At-risk elk on Feedline and High Traffic sites decreased throughout the sampling period, whereas proportions of elk investigating FUs were correlated positively to at-risk elk among all sites within feedgrounds. At-risk elk and proportions of elk investigating FUs were correlated with total feedground elk density and population only on High Traffic and Low Traffic sites. Proportions of sex/age groups (female, juvenile, male) investigating FUs did not differ from background populations. Females, however, spent more time (mean [SE], 21.07 [3.47] sec) investigating FUs than juveniles (14.73 [3.53] sec) and males (10.12 [1.45] sec), with positive correlation between total investigations and time spent investigating per female. Eight species of scavengers consumed FUs, removing FUs faster on feedgrounds than WFR locations and reducing proportions of elk that investigated FUs. Our results suggest that 1) reduction of elk density and time attending feedgrounds, particularly on Feedlines; and 2) protection of scavengers on and adjacent to feedgrounds would likely reduce intraspecific transmission risk of brucellosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395749     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-45.2.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  11 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and risk factors of Brucellosis in Iberian wild ungulates.

Authors:  Pilar M Muñoz; Mariana Boadella; Maricruz Arnal; María J de Miguel; Miguel Revilla; David Martínez; Joaquín Vicente; Pelayo Acevedo; Alvaro Oleaga; Francisco Ruiz-Fons; Clara M Marín; José M Prieto; José de la Fuente; Marta Barral; Montserrat Barberán; Daniel Fernández de Luco; José M Blasco; Christian Gortázar
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Mapping brucellosis increases relative to elk density using hierarchical Bayesian models.

Authors:  Paul C Cross; Dennis M Heisey; Brandon M Scurlock; William H Edwards; Michael R Ebinger; Angela Brennan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Seroepidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Colombia's preeminent dairy region, and its potential public health impact.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Herrán Ramirez; Huarrisson Azevedo Santos; Ingrid Lorena Jaramillo Delgado; Isabele da Costa Angelo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 4.  Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations.

Authors:  R S Miller; S J Sweeney
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America.

Authors:  Ryan S Miller; Steven J Sweeney; Chris Slootmaker; Daniel A Grear; Paul A Di Salvo; Deborah Kiser; Stephanie A Shwiff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Winter feeding of elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and its effects on disease dynamics.

Authors:  Gavin G Cotterill; Paul C Cross; Eric K Cole; Rebecca K Fuda; Jared D Rogerson; Brandon M Scurlock; Johan T du Toit
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Shifting brucellosis risk in livestock coincides with spreading seroprevalence in elk.

Authors:  Angela Brennan; Paul C Cross; Katie Portacci; Brandon M Scurlock; William H Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterizing population and individual migration patterns among native and restored bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis).

Authors:  Blake Lowrey; Kelly M Proffitt; Douglas E McWhirter; Patrick J White; Alyson B Courtemanch; Sarah R Dewey; Hollie M Miyasaki; Kevin L Monteith; Julie S Mao; Jamin L Grigg; Carson J Butler; Ethan S Lula; Robert A Garrott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Carcass Type Affects Local Scavenger Guilds More than Habitat Connectivity.

Authors:  Zachary H Olson; James C Beasley; Olin E Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consumption of Big Game Remains by Scavengers: A Potential Risk as Regards Disease Transmission in Central Spain.

Authors:  Ricardo Carrasco-Garcia; Patricia Barroso; Javier Perez-Olivares; Vidal Montoro; Joaquín Vicente
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.