Literature DB >> 19395437

False-negative results in point-of-care qualitative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) devices due to excess hCGbeta core fragment.

Ann M Gronowski1, Mark Cervinski, Ulf-Håkan Stenman, Alison Woodworth, Lori Ashby, Mitchell G Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) immunoreactivity in urine consists of intact hCG as well as a number of hCG variants including the core fragment of hCGbeta (hCGbeta cf). We identified 3 urine specimens with apparent false-negative results using the OSOM(R) hCG Combo Test (Genzyme Diagnostics) qualitative hCG device and sought to determine whether an excess of 1 of the fragments or variants might be the cause of the interference.
METHODS: We measured concentrations of hCG variants in the urine from 3 patients with apparent false-negative hCG results. Purified hCG variants were added to urines positive for hCG and tested using the OSOM, ICON(R) 25 hCG (Beckman Coulter), and hCG Combo SP(R) Brand (Cardinal Health) devices.
RESULTS: Dilution of these 3 urine samples resulted in positive results on the OSOM device. Quantification of hCG variants in each of the 3 patient urine specimens demonstrated that hCGbeta cf occurred in molar excess of intact hCG. Addition of purified hCGbeta cf to hCG-positive urines caused false-negative hCG results using the OSOM and ICON qualitative urine hCG devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased concentrations of hCGbeta cf can cause false-negative results on the OSOM and ICON qualitative urine hCG devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395437     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.121210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  8 in total

1.  Negative urine pregnancy test in a molar pregnancy: is it possible?

Authors:  Aruna Nigam; Archana Kumari; Nidhi Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-05

2.  Competitive volumetric bar-chart chip with real-time internal control for point-of-care diagnostics.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jie Xuan; Tom Xia; Xin Han; Yujun Song; Zheng Cao; Xin Jiang; Yi Guo; Ping Wang; Lidong Qin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Analytical and clinical validation of the Immulite 1000 hCG assay for quantitative analysis in urine.

Authors:  Frances L Cate; Courtney Moffett; Ann M Gronowski; David G Grenache; Katherine E Hartmann; Alison Woodworth
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.786

4.  Strips of Hope: Accuracy of Home Pregnancy Tests and New Developments.

Authors:  C Gnoth; S Johnson
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Self-testing for pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Karima Gholbzouri; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  False Negative Urine Pregnancy Test: Hook Effect Revealed.

Authors:  Shista Priyadarshini; Fnu Manas; Sheela Prabhu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  Evidence-based pregnancy testing in clinical trials: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder development process.

Authors:  Jessica E Morse; Sara B Calvert; Claire Jurkowski; Melissa Tassinari; Catherine A Sewell; Evan R Myers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A hook effect-free immunochromatographic assay (HEF-ICA) for measuring the C-reactive protein concentration in one drop of human serum.

Authors:  Jusung Oh; Hyou-Arm Joung; Hyung Soo Han; Jong Kun Kim; Min-Gon Kim
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 11.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.