PURPOSE: To analyze results of multimodality treatment in relation to subsite of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 170 patients with LRRC who underwent treatment between 1994 and 2008 were studied. The basic principle of multimodality treatment was preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy, intended radical surgery, and intraoperative radiotherapy. The subsites of LRRC were classified as presacral, posterolateral, (antero)lateral, anterior, anastomotic, or perineal. Subsites were related to radicality of the resection, local re-recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: R0 resections were achieved in 54% of the patients, and 5-year cancer-specific survival was 40.5%. The worst outcomes were seen in presacral LRRC, with only 28% complete resections and 19% 5-year survival (p = 0.03 vs. other subsites). Anastomotic LRRC resulted in the most favorable outcomes, with 77% R0 resections and 60% 5-year survival (p = 0.04). Generally, if a complete resection was achieved, survival improved, except in posterolateral LRRC. Local re-recurrence and metastasis rate were lowest in anastomotic LRRC. CONCLUSIONS: Classification of the subsite of LRRC is a predictor of potentially resectable and consequently curable disease. Treatment of posterior LRRC imposes poor results, whereas anastomotic LRRC location shows superior results.
PURPOSE: To analyze results of multimodality treatment in relation to subsite of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 170 patients with LRRC who underwent treatment between 1994 and 2008 were studied. The basic principle of multimodality treatment was preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy, intended radical surgery, and intraoperative radiotherapy. The subsites of LRRC were classified as presacral, posterolateral, (antero)lateral, anterior, anastomotic, or perineal. Subsites were related to radicality of the resection, local re-recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: R0 resections were achieved in 54% of the patients, and 5-year cancer-specific survival was 40.5%. The worst outcomes were seen in presacral LRRC, with only 28% complete resections and 19% 5-year survival (p = 0.03 vs. other subsites). Anastomotic LRRC resulted in the most favorable outcomes, with 77% R0 resections and 60% 5-year survival (p = 0.04). Generally, if a complete resection was achieved, survival improved, except in posterolateral LRRC. Local re-recurrence and metastasis rate were lowest in anastomotic LRRC. CONCLUSIONS: Classification of the subsite of LRRC is a predictor of potentially resectable and consequently curable disease. Treatment of posterior LRRC imposes poor results, whereas anastomotic LRRC location shows superior results.
Authors: F A Calvo; F Rivas; C V Sole; M Gómez-Espí; R Herranz; E Del Valle; M Rodríguez; E Alvarez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jose M Enríquez-Navascués; Nerea Borda; Aintzane Lizerazu; Carlos Placer; Jose L Elosegui; Juan P Ciria; Adelaida Lacasta; Luis Bujanda Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Johannes Klose; Ignazio Tarantino; Thomas Schmidt; Thomas Bruckner; Yakup Kulu; Tobias Wagner; Martin Schneider; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Claudio V Sole; Felipe A Calvo; Pedro Alvarez de Sierra; Rafael Herranz; Luis Gonzalez-Bayon; Jose Luis García-Sabrido Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Y Nancy You; Halim Habiba; George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-bigas; John M Skibber Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Y N You; J M Skibber; C-Y Hu; C H Crane; P Das; E S Kopetz; C Eng; B W Feig; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; G J Chang Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 6.939