Literature DB >> 25822061

Impact of anatomic location on locally recurrent rectal cancer: superior outcome for intraluminal tumour recurrence.

Johannes Klose1, Ignazio Tarantino, Thomas Schmidt, Thomas Bruckner, Yakup Kulu, Tobias Wagner, Martin Schneider, Markus W Büchler, Alexis Ulrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative surgery predicts patients' prognosis. The correlation between the exact anatomic location of tumour recurrence and patients' survival is still under debate. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the exact location of recurrent rectal cancer on post-operative morbidity and survival.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 90 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. The location of tumour recurrence was classified into intraluminal and extraluminal recurrence. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine the impact on post-operative morbidity and survival.
RESULTS: Patients' survival with intraluminal recurrence was significantly longer compared to patients with extraluminal recurrence (p = 0.027). Curative resection was associated with prolonged survival in univariate and multivariable analyses (p = 0.0001) and was more often achieved in patients with intraluminal recurrence (p = 0.024). Survival of curative resected patients with intraluminal recurrence was significantly longer compared to curatively resected patients with extraluminal recurrence (p = 0.0001). The rate of post-operative morbidity between intraluminal and extraluminal recurrence was not statistically different (p = 0.59).
CONCLUSION: Based on the present investigation, intraluminal recurrence is associated with superior outcome. Post-operative morbidity did not differ significantly between both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25822061     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2804-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  40 in total

1.  Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Cammà; M Giunta; F Fiorica; L Pagliaro; A Craxì; M Cottone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Alexis B Ulrich; Thomas Bruckner; Marc Münter; Axel Nickles; Pietro Contin; Thorsten Löffler; Christoph Reissfelder; Moritz Koch; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Cornelius J H van de Velde; Corrie A M Marijnen; Jan H J M van Krieken; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Early and Late Outcomes of Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Prospective 10-Year Study in the Total Mesorectal Excision Era.

Authors:  Mette Nielsen; Peter Rasmussen; Bodil Pedersen; Rikke Hagemann-Madsen; Jacob Lindegaard; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Prognostic and predictive factors after surgical treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a single institute experience.

Authors:  O Asoglu; H Karanlik; M Muslumanoglu; A Igci; E Emek; V Ozmen; M Kecer; M Parlak; Y Kapran
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Roger Marr; Kevin Birbeck; James Garvican; Christopher P Macklin; Nicholas J Tiffin; Wendy J Parsons; Michael F Dixon; Nicholas P Mapstone; David Sebag-Montefiore; Nigel Scott; David Johnston; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Presentation and prognosis of local recurrence after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  C de Chaisemartin; C Penna; D Goere; S Benoist; A Beauchet; C Julie; B Nordlinger
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients.

Authors:  F T McDermott; E S Hughes; E Pihl; W R Johnson; A B Price
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Optimal preoperative assessment and surgery for rectal cancer may greatly limit the need for radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Simunovic; R Sexton; E Rempel; B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Prognostic factors associated with locally recurrent rectal cancer following primary surgery (Review).

Authors:  Yantao Cai; Zhenyang Li; Xiaodong Gu; Yantian Fang; Jianbin Xiang; Zongyou Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes and prognostic factors of multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent.

Authors:  Thomas G Bird; Samuel Y Ngan; Julie Chu; René Kroon; Andrew C Lynch; Alexander G Heriot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.