INTRODUCTION: Differences in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence between American whites and blacks and between women and men are considered to result, in part, from differences in bone mineral density and geometry at the femur. The aim of this study was to quantify differences in femoral bone density and geometry between a large sample of healthy American white and black women and men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy American white (n=612) and black (n=164) premenopausal women, aged 23 to 57 years, and healthy American white (n=492) and black (n=169) men, aged 20 to 63 years, had volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and geometry variables measured at the femur by computerized tomography (CT), and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at femoral neck measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: American blacks had higher vBMD at the femoral neck and femoral shaft cortex than American whites whereas femoral axis length and femoral neck area were not different. Men had lower vBMD at the femoral neck and femoral cortex than women but had greater femoral axis length and femoral neck area than women. The higher aBMD in American blacks than whites persisted after correction for measured area whereas the higher aBMD in men than women disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: At the femoral neck, American whites have lower bone density than American blacks but similar geometry. Women have higher bone density than men in both races but have smaller geometry variables. The differences in bone density may account in part for the differences in hip fracture incidence between American blacks and whites, whereas the differences in femur size may account for the differences in hip fracture rates between men and women.
INTRODUCTION: Differences in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence between American whites and blacks and between women and men are considered to result, in part, from differences in bone mineral density and geometry at the femur. The aim of this study was to quantify differences in femoral bone density and geometry between a large sample of healthy American white and black women and men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy American white (n=612) and black (n=164) premenopausal women, aged 23 to 57 years, and healthy American white (n=492) and black (n=169) men, aged 20 to 63 years, had volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and geometry variables measured at the femur by computerized tomography (CT), and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at femoral neck measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: American blacks had higher vBMD at the femoral neck and femoral shaft cortex than American whites whereas femoral axis length and femoral neck area were not different. Men had lower vBMD at the femoral neck and femoral cortex than women but had greater femoral axis length and femoral neck area than women. The higher aBMD in American blacks than whites persisted after correction for measured area whereas the higher aBMD in men than women disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: At the femoral neck, American whites have lower bone density than American blacks but similar geometry. Women have higher bone density than men in both races but have smaller geometry variables. The differences in bone density may account in part for the differences in hip fracture incidence between American blacks and whites, whereas the differences in femur size may account for the differences in hip fracture rates between men and women.
Authors: Michael J Econs; Daniel L Koller; Siu L Hui; Tonya Fishburn; P Michael Conneally; C Conrad Johnston; Munro Peacock; Tatiana M Foroud Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2004-01-16 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Munro Peacock; Daniel L Koller; Siu Hui; C Conrad Johnston; Tatiana Foroud; Michael J Econs Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-03-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Linda D McCabe; Berdine R Martin; George P McCabe; Conrad C Johnston; Connie M Weaver; Munro Peacock Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Imranul Alam; Daniel L Koller; Qiwei Sun; Ryan K Roeder; Toni Cañete; Gloria Blázquez; Regina López-Aumatell; Esther Martínez-Membrives; Elia Vicens-Costa; Carme Mont; Sira Díaz; Adolf Tobeña; Alberto Fernández-Teruel; Adam Whitley; Pernilla Strid; Margarita Diez; Martina Johannesson; Jonathan Flint; Michael J Econs; Charles H Turner; Tatiana Foroud Journal: Bone Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: S J Warden; K M Hill; A J Ferira; E M Laing; B R Martin; D B Hausman; C M Weaver; M Peacock; R D Lewis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Akira Fujiyoshi; Lynda E Polgreen; Daniel L Hurley; Myron D Gross; Stephen Sidney; David R Jacobs Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: D L Osborne; C M Weaver; L D McCabe; G P McCabe; R Novotny; M D Van Loan; S Going; V Matkovic; C J Boushey; D A Savaiano Journal: Bone Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Dong Li; Song Shou Mao; Bahram Khazai; Joseph A Hyder; Matthew Allison; Robyn McClelland; Ian de Boer; J Jeffrey Carr; Michael H Criqui; Yanlin Gao; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Melissa S Putman; Elaine W Yu; Hang Lee; Robert M Neer; Elizabeth Schindler; Alexander P Taylor; Emily Cheston; Mary L Bouxsein; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.741