Literature DB >> 19394131

Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy.

Louis Spencer Krane1, Mahendra Bhandari, James O Peabody, Mani Menon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) traditionally require urethral catheterization for adequate bladder drainage in the postoperative period. However, many patients have significant discomfort from the urethral catheter.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique of percutaneous suprapubic tube (PST) bladder drainage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and to evaluate patient discomfort, complications, continence, and stricture rate after this procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred two patients undergoing RALP were drained with a 14F PST instead of a urethral catheter. The PST was placed robotically at the conclusion of the urethrovesical anastomosis and secured to the skin over a plastic button. Beginning on postoperative day 5, patients clamped the PST, urinated per urethra, and measured the postvoid residual (PVR) drained by PST. The PST was removed when residuals were <30 cm(3) per void. The control group consisted of 50 consecutive patients undergoing RALP with urethral catheter drainage. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was catheter-associated discomfort as measured with the Faces Pain Score-Revised (FPS-R). Secondary end points included use of anticholinergics, complications related to the PST, urinary continence, and urethral stricture. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: When compared with urethral catheter patients, PST patients had significantly decreased catheter-related discomfort on postoperative days 2 and 6 (p<0.001). Anticholinergic medication was required by one PST and four urethral catheter patients (p<0.001). Ten patients required urethral catheterization for PST dislodgement (n=5) or urinary retention (n=5). No patient has developed a urethral stricture at a mean follow-up of 7 mo.
CONCLUSIONS: PST provides adequate urinary drainage following RALP with less patient discomfort and no increased risk of urethral stricture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394131     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  19 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Nina Natascha Harke; Christian Wagner; Nikolaos Liakos; Katarina Urbanova; Mustapha Addali; Boris A Hadaschik; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.

Authors:  Riccardo Bertolo; Andrew Tracey; Prokar Dasgupta; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Giampaolo Bianchi; Lance Hampton; Ash K Tewari; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Predictors of catheter-related bladder discomfort after urological surgery.

Authors:  Cong Li; Zheng Liu; Fan Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-19

6.  The transurethral suprapubic endo-cystostomy (T-SPeC): a novel suprapubic catheter insertion device.

Authors:  Lawrence I Karsh; R Blair Egerdie; David M Albala; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Martinschek; D Pfalzgraf; B Rafail; M Ritter; E Heinrich; L Trojan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nina Harke; Michael Godes; Jawid Habibzada; Katarina Urbanova; Christian Wagner; Henrik Zecha; Mustapha Addali; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Advances and future directions in management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Louis S Krane; Manish N Patel; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  The comparison of transurethral versus suprapubic catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ze'an Li; Kaiwen Li; Wanhua Wu; Qiong Wang; Xiaoming Ma; Chunhao Lin; Shengmeng Peng; Yiming Lai; Fen Wang; Hai Huang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.