Literature DB >> 19393841

Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study.

Mats Karlsson1, Anna-Carin Berggren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches and prolonged-release tramadol tablets in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain of the hip and/or knee.
METHODS: Eligible patients were adults with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, as confirmed by a mean Box Scale 11 (BS-11) score >or=4 while using paracetamol 4000 mg/d for pain during the screening week. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches (patch strengths of 5, 10, and 20 microg/h, with a maximum dosage of 20 microg/h) or twice-daily prolonged-release tramadol tablets (tablet strengths of 75, 100, 150, and 200 mg, with a maximum dosage of 400 mg/d) over a 12-week open-label treatment period. Supplementary paracetamol was available as rescue medication throughout the study. The primary end point was the difference in BS-11 scores from baseline to the completion of treatment. Noninferiority was assumed if the treatment difference on the BS-11 scale was -1.5 boxes, indicating a clinically meaningful result. Secondary efficacy variables were rescue medication use, sleep disturbance and quality of sleep, and patients' and investigators' global assessments of pain relief. In addition, patient preference was assessed at the completion visit by asking patients whether, given equal pain relief, they would prefer basic treatment for OA pain with a patch applied once weekly or a tablet taken twice daily. Exploratory variables included investigators' assessments of patients' pain, stiffness, and ability to perform daily activities (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index); patients' quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D health states index and EuroQol visual analog scale); and abuse and diversion of study drug.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients (69 receiving 7-day buprenorphine patches and 65 receiving tramadol tablets) were randomized and received >or=1 dose of study medication. A respective 98.6% and 100% of the 2 treatment groups were white, with mean (SD) ages of 64.4 (11.1) and 64.2 (9.3) years. Both treatments were associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain from baseline to study completion. The least squares mean change from baseline in BS-11 scores in the 7-day buprenorphine patch and tramadol tablet groups was -2.26 (95% CI, -2.76 to -1.76) and -2.09 (95% CI, -2.61 to -1.58). The efficacy of 7-day buprenorphine patches was noninferior to that of prolonged-release tramadol tablets. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the 2 treatment groups: 226 AEs were reported in 61 patients (88.4%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group, and 152 AEs were reported in 51 patients (78.5%) in the tramadol group. Ten patients (14.5%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 19 (29.2%) in the tramadol tablet group withdrew from the study due to AEs. The most common AEs in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group were nausea (30.4%), constipation (18.8%), and dizziness (15.9%); the most common AEs in the tramadol tablet group were nausea (24.6%), fatigue (18.5%), and pain (12.3%). Most patients (47/67 [70.1%] in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 43/61 [70.5%] in the tramadol tablet group) reported that they would prefer a 7-day patch to a twice-daily tablet for future pain treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In these patients with chronic, moderate to severe OA pain of the hip and/or knee, 7-day low-dose buprenorphine patches were an effective and well-tolerated analgesic. The buprenorphine patches were noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol tablets. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number: 2006-003233-32.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393841     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  34 in total

Review 1.  Buprenorphine 5, 10 and 20 μg/h transdermal patch: a review of its use in the management of chronic non-malignant pain.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Outcomes associated with opioid use in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Papaleontiou; Charles R Henderson; Barbara J Turner; Alison A Moore; Yelena Olkhovskaya; Leslie Amanfo; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Tramadol for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Karine Toupin April; Jacinthe Bisaillon; Vivian Welch; Lara J Maxwell; Peter Jüni; Anne Ws Rutjes; M Elaine Husni; Jennifer Vincent; Tania El Hindi; George A Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-27

4.  Comparative study of the efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patches and prolonged-release tramadol tablets for postoperative pain control after spinal fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Hyo Sae Ahn; Yunjin Nam; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Transdermal buprenorphine in non-oncological moderate-to-severe chronic pain.

Authors:  Antonio Gatti; Mario Dauri; Francesca Leonardis; Giuseppe Longo; Franco Marinangeli; Massimo Mammucari; Alessandro Fabrizio Sabato
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Buprenorphine 5, 10 and 20 μg/h transdermal patch: a guide to its use in chronic non-malignant pain.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  [Recommendations for symptomatic therapy of rheumatic pain with opioid analgetics].

Authors:  W W Bolten; S Reiter
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Buprenorphine transdermal system for opioid therapy in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Allan Gordon; Saifudin Rashiq; Dwight E Moulin; Alexander J Clark; André D Beaulieu; John Eisenhoffer; Paula S Piraino; Patricia Quigley; Zoltan Harsanyi; Andrew C Darke
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Progressive change in joint degeneration in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis treated with fentanyl in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fujii; Koshi Takana; Sumihisa Orita; Gen Inoue; Nobuyasu Ochiai; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Yasuchika Aoki; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Gou Kubota; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Jun Sato; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Tomoaki Toyone; Junichi Nakamura; Shunji Kishida; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Buprenorphine disrupts sleep and decreases adenosine concentrations in sleep-regulating brain regions of Sprague Dawley rat.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gauthier; Sarah E Guzick; Chad M Brummett; Helen A Baghdoyan; Ralph Lydic
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.