Literature DB >> 20670047

Transdermal buprenorphine in non-oncological moderate-to-severe chronic pain.

Antonio Gatti1, Mario Dauri, Francesca Leonardis, Giuseppe Longo, Franco Marinangeli, Massimo Mammucari, Alessandro Fabrizio Sabato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pathologies are among the most frequent causes of long-term non-oncological severe pain and consequent physical impairment. Aims of pharmacological and physical therapy are to reduce pain, promote functional recovery and improve overall quality of life. Pharmacological therapy may include the use of opioids.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine (TDS) in the long-term management of non-oncological, chronic, moderate-to-severe musculoskeletal pain. STUDY
DESIGN: An open-label, prospective, single-centre, 6-month study.
SETTING: A 'real world' outpatient setting. PATIENTS: Adult patients with chronic moderate-to-severe musculoskeletal pain were enrolled consecutively. INTERVENTION: Patients initially received buprenorphine TDS 11.7 microg/h (one-third of 35 microg/h patch) every 72 hours. If required, patients could be up-titrated to 17.5 microg/h (one-half of 35 microg/h patch), 23.4 microg/h (two-thirds of 35 microg/h patch) or 35 microg/h. Concomitant antiemetics were allowed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was percentage mean reduction in static and dynamic pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at study end (10 being worst pain, 0 being no pain). Quality of life and tolerability were also assessed.
RESULTS: We enrolled 146 patients aged 41-94 years; their baseline mean +/- SD static and dynamic pain VAS scores were 6.87 +/- 1.89 and 7.70 +/- 1.74, respectively. Buprenorphine TDS initial dosages were 11.7 microg/h (n = 139), 17.5 microg/h (n = 4), 23.4 microg/h (n = 1) and 35 microg/h (n = 2). At 6 months, 89 patients were under treatment; 11% (n = 10) were receiving 11.7 microg/h, 30% (n = 27) 17.5 microg/h, 6% (n = 5) 23.4 microg/h and 53% (n = 47) 35 microg/h. Patients achieved a nonsignificant reduction in pain at rest and in movement; mean +/- SD static and dynamic pain VAS scores decreased to 1.56 +/- 2.05 and 3.54 +/- 2.02, respectively. The quality of life improved as shown by significant (p < 0.01) increases from baseline in all items relating to physical and mental health on the Short-Form 36 health survey. Patients experienced recovery of daily and social activities according to the significant (p < 0.01) increase in Karnofsky Performance Status sub-item scores. Twenty-three patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, which were mainly gastrointestinal or CNS-related.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose buprenorphine TDS had good analgesic efficacy, and quality of life improved as early as 1 month after treatment initiation. Our results suggest that buprenorphine TDS is a well tolerated long-term analgesic for patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain of moderate-to-severe intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20670047     DOI: 10.2165/1158409-S0-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Italian consensus on EULAR recommendations 2005 for the management of hip osteoarthritis].

Authors:  L Punzi; M Doherty; W Zhang; M A Cimmino; M Carrabba; L Frizziero; W Grassi; G Lapadula; V Modena; G Arioli; O Brignoli; B Canesi; M Cazzola; C Cricelli; A Faldini; A Fioravanti; R Gimigliano; A Giustini; F Iannone; G Leardini; R Meliconi; L Molfetta; P Patrignani; L Parente; R Ramonda; G Randelli; F Salaffi; A Spadaro; S Bombardieri
Journal:  Reumatismo       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  SIAARTI recommendations for chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  F Ambrosio; G Finco; C Mattia; R Mediati; F Paoletti; F Coluzzi; Q Piacevoli; G Savoia; B Amantea; C Aurilio; C Bonezzi; D Camaioni; M Chiefari; A Costantini; M Evangelista; S Ischia; E Mondello; E Polati; W Raffaeli; A F Sabato; G Varrassi; M Visentin; R Tufano
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain: practice guidelines for initiation and maintenance of therapy.

Authors:  F Coluzzi; M Pappagallo
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  The socioeconomic impact of chronic pain.

Authors:  J Latham; B D Davis
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 5.  Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Eija Kalso; Jayne E Edwards; Andrew R Moore; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  Update on guidelines for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Long-term management of chronic pain with transdermal buprenorphine: a multicenter, open-label, follow-up study in patients from three short-term clinical trials.

Authors:  Rudolf Likar; Hubertus Kayser; Reinhard Sittl
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 8.  Clinical update on the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine.

Authors:  Hans G Kress
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

Authors:  V Mor; L Laliberte; J N Morris; M Wiemann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Transdermal buprenorphine patches applied in a 4-day regimen versus a 3-day regimen: a single-site, Phase III, randomized, open-label, crossover comparison.

Authors:  Rudolf Likar; Violetta Lorenz; Maria Korak-Leiter; Ingo Kager; Reinhard Sittl
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of inflammation-induced depression of home cage wheel running in rats reveals the difference between opioid antinociception and restoration of function.

Authors:  Ram Kandasamy; Jonas J Calsbeek; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone for chronic pain in at-risk patients: development and pilot test of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Andrew Rosenblum; Ricardo A Cruciani; Eric C Strain; Charles M Cleland; Herman Joseph; Stephen Magura; Lisa A Marsch; Laura F McNicholas; Seddon R Savage; Arun Sundaram; Russell K Portenoy
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain with buprenorphine buccal film using novel bioerodible mucoadhesive technology.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert B Raffa; Charles Fleischer; Gianpietro Zampogna; Robert Taylor
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Pain Control in Latin America: The Optimized Role of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Cancer and Noncancer Pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert Taylor; Jo Ann LeQuang; Argelia Lara; Andres Hernandez Ortiz; Miguel A Ruiz Iban
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-05-17

5.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of 2 or 3 tablets of biphasic immediate-release/extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate/acetaminophen (MNK-155) under fed and fasted conditions: two randomized open-label trials.

Authors:  Krishna Devarakonda; Kenneth Kostenbader; Michael J Giuliani; Jim L Young
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.483

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.