| Literature DB >> 19393048 |
Sean MacEachern1, John McEwan, Alan McCulloch, Andrew Mather, Keith Savin, Mike Goddard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: If mutation within the coding region of the genome is largely not adaptive, the ratio of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous substitutions (dS) per site (dN/dS) should be approximately equal among closely related species. Furthermore, dN/dS in divergence between species should be equivalent to dN/dS in polymorphisms. This hypothesis is of particular interest in closely related members of the Bovini tribe, because domestication has promoted rapid phenotypic divergence through strong artificial selection of some species while others remain undomesticated. We examined a number of genes that may be involved in milk production in Domestic cattle and a number of their wild relatives for evidence that domestication had affected molecular evolution. Elevated rates of dN/dS were further queried to determine if they were the result of positive selection, low effective population size (N(e)) or reduced selective constraint.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19393048 PMCID: PMC2681479 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Summary of the representative species and whether they were considered domesticated
| Subfamily Bovinae | |||
| Tribe | Representative species | Domesticated | Note |
| Tragelaphini | No | Undomesticated | |
| Bovini | No | Undomesticated | |
| Bovini | Yes | Domesticated in India and Asia | |
| Bovini | Yes | Domesticated in East Asia | |
| Bovini | No | Undomesticated | |
| Bovini | Yes/No | Domesticated in Asia & some wild species still exist | |
| Bovini | Yes | Domesticated in Mideast | |
| Bovini | Yes/No | Domesticated in Indonesia & some wild species still exist | |
| Bovini | No | Some history, but in general considered undomesticated | |
| Bovini | Yes | May be a domestic version of | |
Significance tests for the effect of gene (g), amplicon within gene (a) and species (s).
| Variables | g | a | s | e |
| dN | *** | *** | 0.777 | 0.00001 |
| dS | 0.813 | *** | *** | 0.0005 |
| dN/(dN+dS) | *** | *** | 0.287 | 0.0309 |
| Dr | 0.636 | *** | 0.251 | 0.0127 |
| Dc | *** | *** | 0.413 | 0.1942 |
| Dr/(Dr+Dc) | 0.986 | *** | 0.296 | 0.0138 |
| dI | 0.637 | *** | *** | 0.00006 |
Numbers in columns g, a and s are p-values, *** = p < 0.001
The error MS is given in the final column (e)
Estimated gene effects in bold (and s.e.) are deviations from mean values from GLM 1 minus amplicon y = u + g + s + e effect for dN and dN/(dN+dS), where g and s = gene and species effects, respectively and e = residual error.
| Estimated effect | dN | dN/(dN+dS) |
| Mean (μ) | ||
| Gene (g) | ||
| 5HT1F | ||
| 5HT6 | ||
| EGF | ||
| ERa | ||
| GMEB1 | ||
| HFABP | ||
| IGFBP2 | ||
| IGFBP5 | ||
| ITGBP5 | ||
| LACS3 | ||
| MFG8E | ||
| NRIP1 | ||
| PABPC1 | ||
| PIT1 | ||
| PRRP |
Figure 1Comparison of a neutral phylogeny and amino acid variation, neighbour joining analysis for members of the Bovini tribe (Anc: Ancient, Ban: Banteng, Bis: Bison, BubB & BubC: Asian buffalo, water and swamp type, Ela: Eland, Gau: Gaur, Her: Hereford, Ind & Mur: Indian water buffalo, Mit: Mithan, Hol: Holstein, Syn: African buffalo, Tul: Tuli, and Yak) using Kimura two parameter model with bootstrap values (5000 replicates) overlying branchpoints from an alignment of 21,055 bp with 1526 segregating sites from noncoding sequence, with the corresponding number of amino acid changes per site to the right of each species when compared to the Eland outgroup * highlights the largest number of aa changes per site.
Summary of the total number of sites, substitutions and substitutions per site at synonymous and noncoding regions, substitutions involving CpGs, relative proportion of substitutions involving CpG dinucleotides and the number of substitutions per site without the influence of CpG dinucleotides
| Total sites | Total substitutions | Substitutions per site | Substitutions involving CpGs | Proportion of substitutions involving CpGs | Substitutions per site sans CpG | |
| Synonymous | 286,995 | 7,394 | 0.026 | 2,262 | 0.31 | 0.018 |
| Noncoding | 3,767,771 | 68,602 | 0.018 | 8,212 | 0.12 | 0.016 |
Chi-Square comparing the relative proportion of substitutions involving CpG dinucleotides at synonymous and noncoding sites χ2 = 1,300, p < 0.001 and substitutions that did not involve CpG dinucleotides χ2 = 55.7, p < 0.001
Pairwise comparisons between Bovinae representatives for the number of silent substitutions per site summarised for all genes, with intronic substitutions (dI) below the diagonal and synonymous substitutions (dS) above the diagonal in bold
| Her | Hol | Tul | Bis | Yak | Ban | Mit | Gau | BubB | Mur | Ind | BubC | Syn | Ela | |
| Her | - | |||||||||||||
| Hol | 0.003 | - | ||||||||||||
| Tul | 0.004 | 0.003 | - | |||||||||||
| Bis | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.009 | - | ||||||||||
| Yak | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.006 | - | |||||||||
| Ban | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.008 | - | ||||||||
| Mit | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | - | |||||||
| Gau | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.006 | - | ||||||
| BubB | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.023 | - | |||||
| Mur | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.024 | - | ||||
| Ind | 0.028 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 0.003 | - | |||
| BubC | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.003 | - | ||
| Syn | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.024 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.016 | - | |
| Ela | 0.04 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.04 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.037 | 0.037 | - |
Species: (Ban: Banteng, Bis: Bison, Ind & Mur: Water buffalo (river type), BubB & BubC: Water buffalo (swamp type), Ela: Eland, Gau: Gaur, Her: Hereford, Mit: Mithan, Hol: Holstein, Syn: African buffalo, Tul: Tuli, and Yak)
Figure 2the rate of substitution at synonymous sites (dS) plotted against the rate of substitution at noncoding sites (dI) for all paiwise comparisons within the Bovini tribe.
Pairwise comparisons between all Bovinae representatives for the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions per site (dN/dS) summarised for all genes below the diagonal and dN above the diagonal in bold
| Her | Hol | Tul | Bis | Yak | Ban | Mit | Gau | BubB | Mur | Ind | BubC | Syn | Ela | |
| Her | - | |||||||||||||
| Hol | 0.214 | - | ||||||||||||
| Tul | 0.239 | 0.112 | - | |||||||||||
| Bis | 0.12 | 0.085 | 0.099 | - | ||||||||||
| Yak | 0.125 | 0.107 | 0.111 | 0.126 | - | |||||||||
| Ban | 0.126 | 0.096 | 0.093 | 0.089 | 0.127 | - | ||||||||
| Mit | 0.185 | 0.211 | 0.185 | 0.132 | 0.21 | 0.163 | - | |||||||
| Gau | 0.096 | 0.076 | 0.088 | 0.049 | 0.121 | 0.087 | 0.165 | - | ||||||
| BubB | 0.102 | 0.097 | 0.084 | 0.09 | 0.108 | 0.095 | 0.104 | 0.081 | - | |||||
| Mur | 0.091 | 0.088 | 0.065 | 0.074 | 0.093 | 0.088 | 0.087 | 0.08 | 0.135 | - | ||||
| Ind | 0.01 | 0.091 | 0.077 | 0.075 | 0.095 | 0.086 | 0.095 | 0.074 | 0.099 | 0.06 | - | |||
| BubC | 0.098 | 0.095 | 0.083 | 0.085 | 0.097 | 0.102 | 0.098 | 0.08 | 0.049 | 0.149 | 0.185 | - | ||
| Syn | 0.097 | 0.088 | 0.078 | 0.074 | 0.088 | 0.079 | 0.091 | 0.06 | 0.115 | 0.108 | 0.092 | 0.112 | - | |
| Ela | 0.102 | 0.124 | 0.094 | 0.098 | 0.101 | 0.114 | 0.098 | 0.0106 | 0.113 | 0.111 | 0.086 | 0.122 | 0.094 | - |
Species: (Ban: Banteng, Bis: Bison, Ind & Mur: Water buffalo (river type), BubB & BubC: Water buffalo (swamp type), Ela: Eland, Gau: Gaur, Her: Hereford, Mit: Mithan, Hol: Holstein, Syn: African buffalo, Tul: Tuli, and Yak)
Figure 3Relationship between the evolutionary ratio (dN/dS) plotted against the number of substitutions for noncoding DNA per site (dI) for all pairwise comparisons within Bovini.
Pairwise comparisons between domestic and nondomestic members of the Bovina subtribe for dN/dS calculated for all mutations and sites sampled.
| Ban | Bis | Gau | Yak | Her | Mith | Hol | Tul | |
| Ban | * | |||||||
| Bis | 0.089 | * | ||||||
| Gau | 0.087 | 0.049 | * | |||||
| Yak | 0.127 | 0.126 | 0.121 | * | ||||
| Her | 0.126 | 0.12 | 0.096 | 0.125 | * | |||
| Mit | 0.163 | 0.132 | 0.165 | 0.21 | 0.185 | * | ||
| Hol | 0.096 | 0.085 | 0.076 | 0.107 | 0.214 | 0.211 | * | |
| Tul | 0.093 | 0.099 | 0.088 | 0.111 | 0.239 | 0.185 | 0.112 | * |
Species: (Ban: Banteng, Bis: Bison, Gau: Gaur, Her: Hereford, Mit: Mithan, Hol: Holstein, Tul: Tuli, and Yak)
Pairwise comparisons in top left between 2 undomesticated animals, bottom left between 1 domestic and one undomesticated animal, and bottom right two domestic animals
Summary of total Holstein polymorphisms for all genes
| Noncoding sites | Ki | dI | Nonsynonymous sites | Synonymous sites | Ka | Ks | dN | dS | dN/dS |
| 45,102 | 168 | 0.0037 | 8561 | 2671 | 3 | 5 | 0.00035 | 0.0019 | 0.187 |
Modified McDondald-Kreitman test examining variation between ancient polymorphism and pairwise comparisons between species and breeds for the ratio of nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) polymorphisms
| Ancient | Substitutions | Polymorphisms | |||||||||
| Ba-Mi | Ga-Mi | He-Mi | Bi-Mi | Ho-Mi | Tu-Mi | Ya-Mi | He-Ho | He-Tu | Ho-Tu | ||
| Ka | 6 | 17 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Ks | 27 | 31 | 18 | 29 | 36 | 24 | 29 | 27 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
| dN/dS | 0.065 | 0.163 | 0.165 | 0.185 | 0.132 | 0.211 | 0.185 | 0.21 | 0.213 | 0.239 | 0.112 |
| χ2 | - | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| p | - | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.5 |
Species: (Ba: Banteng, Bi: Bison, Ga: Gaur, He: Hereford, Mi: Mithan, Ho: Holstein, Tu: Tuli,, Ya: Yak)