Literature DB >> 19390469

Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.

Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan1, Elizabeth L Irving, William R Bobier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare vergence adaptation to +2 D addition lenses in myopic and emmetropic children and to evaluate the influence of the accommodative-vergence crosslink (AC/A ratio) on this adaptation.
METHODS: Nine myopic and 11 emmetropic children fixated a near target at a distance of 33 cm. Measures of binocular and monocular accommodation and phoria were obtained during a 20-min near task with and without +2 D lenses. Response AC/A ratios were determined from the experimental results. Vergence adaptation was quantified by the magnitude of reduction in phoria and the percentage of completeness (PC, return of adapted phoria to habitual level) after the near task.
RESULTS: Myopic children showed significantly higher AC/A ratios, which led to greater lens-induced exophoria and a greater demand for vergence adaptation. Both refractive groups showed significant vergence adaptation; however, myopes exhibited significantly reduced (p < 0.01) magnitudes compared with emmetropes (myopes = 3.95 +/- 0.15 Delta; emmetropes = 4.41 +/- 0.08 Delta). The mean PC was also significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in myopes (61.02 +/- 1.57) compared with emmetropes (76.6 +/- 2.10). There was a significant correlation between magnitude of adaptation and AC/A in both the refractive groups; however, myopes consistently showed reduced magnitudes compared to emmetropes. AC/A ratio influenced PC in emmetropic but not myopic children. In the accommodation system, +2 D lenses eliminated the accommodative lags observed in myopic children during natural viewing conditions. These lenses resulted in a small over-focus (-0.24 +/- 0.27 D) at the onset of near work, which decreased during sustained viewing through the near add.
CONCLUSIONS: Myopic children demonstrate reduced magnitude and completeness of vergence adaptation to +2 D lenses. The magnitude of vergence adaptation varied with AC/A in both refractive groups; however, the presence of myopia differentiated the amount of adaptation for all AC/A ratios. Conversely, the degree of completeness appears to be primarily associated with the type of refractive error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19390469     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a59d78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  Near heterophoria in early childhood.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of symmetrical prism adaptation to asymmetrical prism adaptation in those with normal binocular vision.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Chang Yaramothu; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Variability of Accommodative Microfluctuations in Myopic and Emmetropic Juveniles during Sustained near Work.

Authors:  Hanyang Yu; Junwen Zeng; Zhouyue Li; Yin Hu; Dongmei Cui; Wenchen Zhao; Feng Zhao; Xiao Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Test-retest of a phoria adaptation stimulus-induced functional MRI experiment.

Authors:  Cristian Morales; Suril Gohel; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Elio M Santos; Ayushi Sangoi; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.