C Grivans1, S Lindgren, A Aneman, O Stenqvist, S Lundin. 1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. christina.grivans@vgregion.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim was to describe current practices for drug administration through inhalation, endotracheal suctioning and lung recruitment maneuvers in mechanically ventilated patients in Scandinavian intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We invited 161 ICUs to participate in a web-based survey regarding (1) their routine standards and (2) current treatment of ventilated patients during the past 24 h. In order to characterize the patients, the lowest PaO(2) with the corresponding highest FiO(2), and the highest PaO(2) with the corresponding lowest FiO(2) during the 24-h study period were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-seven ICUs answered and reported 186 patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (cmH(2)O) were 5-9 in 65% and >10 in 31% of the patients. Forty percent of the patients had heated humidification and 50% received inhalation of drugs. Endotracheal suctioning was performed >7 times during the study period in 40% of the patients, of which 23% had closed suction systems. Twenty percent of the patients underwent recruitment maneuvers. The most common recruitment maneuver was to increase PEEP and gradually increase the inspiratory pressure. Twenty-six percent of the calculated PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratios varied >13 kPa for the same patient. CONCLUSION: Frequent use of drug administration through inhalation and endotracheal suctioning predispose to derecruitment of the lungs, possibly resulting in the large variations in PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratios observed during the 24-h study period. Recruitment maneuvers were performed only in one-fifth of the patients during the day of the survey.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to describe current practices for drug administration through inhalation, endotracheal suctioning and lung recruitment maneuvers in mechanically ventilated patients in Scandinavian intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We invited 161 ICUs to participate in a web-based survey regarding (1) their routine standards and (2) current treatment of ventilated patients during the past 24 h. In order to characterize the patients, the lowest PaO(2) with the corresponding highest FiO(2), and the highest PaO(2) with the corresponding lowest FiO(2) during the 24-h study period were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-seven ICUs answered and reported 186 patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (cmH(2)O) were 5-9 in 65% and >10 in 31% of the patients. Forty percent of the patients had heated humidification and 50% received inhalation of drugs. Endotracheal suctioning was performed >7 times during the study period in 40% of the patients, of which 23% had closed suction systems. Twenty percent of the patients underwent recruitment maneuvers. The most common recruitment maneuver was to increase PEEP and gradually increase the inspiratory pressure. Twenty-six percent of the calculated PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratios varied >13 kPa for the same patient. CONCLUSION: Frequent use of drug administration through inhalation and endotracheal suctioning predispose to derecruitment of the lungs, possibly resulting in the large variations in PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratios observed during the 24-h study period. Recruitment maneuvers were performed only in one-fifth of the patients during the day of the survey.
Authors: David M P van Meenen; Sophia M van der Hoeven; Jan M Binnekade; Corianne A J M de Borgie; Maruschka P Merkus; Frank H Bosch; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Haringman; Nardo J M van der Meer; Hazra S Moeniralam; Mathilde Slabbekoorn; Marcella C A Muller; Willemke Stilma; Bart van Silfhout; Ary Serpa Neto; Hans F M Ter Haar; Jan Van Vliet; Jan Willem Wijnhoven; Janneke Horn; Nicole P Juffermans; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz; Frederique Paulus Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephan Ehrmann; Ferran Roche-Campo; Laetitia Bodet-Contentin; Keyvan Razazi; Jonathan Dugernier; Josep Trenado-Alvarez; Alexis Donzeau; François Vermeulen; David Thévoz; Metaxia Papanikolaou; Antoine Edelson; Héctor León Yoshido; Lise Piquilloud; Karim Lakhal; Carlos Lopes; Carlos Vicent; Arnaud Desachy; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea; Daniel Isabey; Laurent Brochard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sophia M van der Hoeven; Jan M Binnekade; Corianne A J M de Borgie; Frank H Bosch; Henrik Endeman; Janneke Horn; Nicole P Juffermans; Nardo J M van der Meer; Maruschka P Merkus; Hazra S Moeniralam; Bart van Silfhout; Mathilde Slabbekoorn; Willemke Stilma; Jan Willem Wijnhoven; Marcus J Schultz; Frederique Paulus Journal: Trials Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Espen Rostrup Nakstad; Helge Opdahl; Fridtjof Heyerdahl; Fredrik Borchsenius; Ole Henning Skjønsberg Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2017-05-08