Literature DB >> 19388615

Subsidence of metal interbody cage after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation.

Yasuaki Tokuhashi1, Yasumitsu Ajiro, Natsuki Umezawa.   

Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion is considered to be an excellent fusion procedure to stabilize anterior support, correct alignment in the sagittal and coronal plane, and achieve foraminal decompression by lifting the disk height. The metal interbody cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion is thought to be useful to prevent collapse of the graft bone and to correct and maintain disk height; however, some studies have noted a gradual decrease of disk height due to cage subsidence. Therefore, to investigate the significance of cage subsidence, 86 disk levels radiographically confirmed to have good union in 66 patients with posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation and a single metal cage for degenerative lumbar disease were retrospectively evaluated. The follow-up period ranged from 3 years to 10 years 3 months, with a mean of 7 years 9 months. Cage subsidence often showed a gradual increase over time. At final follow-up, subsidence averaged 4.0 mm on the cranial surface and 2.7 mm on the caudal surface. Although the average increase of disk height was 3.2 mm immediately postoperatively, the final disk height decreased by 4.2 mm on average from that time. The degree of cage subsidence and decrease of disk height were not correlated with the final clinical results. Subsidence was not correlated with bone mineral density in the vertebral body, body weight, or site of the insertion. On the other hand, the wedge shape of the cage and the thickness of the resected endplate had a significant influence on cage subsidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19388615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  12 in total

1.  Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Gloria Giang; Monish M Maharaj; Steven Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

2.  Differences in Trabecular Bone, Cortical Shell, and Endplate Microstructure Across the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Vivek Palepu; Sai Deepa Rayaprolu; Srinidhi Nagaraja
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

3.  Pseudarthrosis after lumbar spinal fusion: the role of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Marloes Peters; Paul Willems; Rene Weijers; Roel Wierts; Liesbeth Jutten; Christian Urbach; Chris Arts; Lodewijk van Rhijn; Boudewijn Brans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery.

Authors:  B Hentenaar; A B Spoor; J de Waal Malefijt; C H Diekerhof; B L den Oudsten
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Modified technique of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for segmental correction of lumbar kyphosis: a safe alternative to osteotomies?

Authors:  Sebastian Weckbach; Heiko Reichel; Michael Kraus; Tugrul Kocak; Friederike Lattig
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-07-05

6.  Early results of thoraco lumbar burst fracture treatment using selective corpectomy and rectangular cage reconstruction.

Authors:  Bowei Liang; Guofeng Huang; Luobing Ding; Liangqi Kang; Mo Sha; Zhenqi Ding
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Cage subsidence in lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas approach: intraoperative endplate injury or late-onset settling.

Authors:  Kotaro Satake; Tokumi Kanemura; Hiroaki Nakashima; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Naoki Segi; Jun Ouchida
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Effect of Cage in Radiological Differences between Direct and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Techniques.

Authors:  Myeong Jin Ko; Seung Won Park; Young Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-05-08

9.  Clinical outcomes of two types of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: n-HA/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages.

Authors:  Qian-xing Deng; Yun-sheng Ou; Yong Zhu; Zeng-hui Zhao; Bo Liu; Qiu Huang; Xing Du; Dian-ming Jiang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chenxu Wang; Xiang Yin; Liang Zhang; Xin Xue; Yu Xiang; Huaijian Jin; Mingyong Liu; Jianhua Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.