PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of real-time radial k-t sensitivity encoding (SENSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for biventricular volumetric assessment during exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 12 healthy young adults underwent MRI at rest and during supine exercise at three different workload intensities. Biventricular volumes and function were assessed with 1) a radial k-t SENSE real-time sequence and 2) a scanner vendor supplied (standard) real-time sequence. Global image quality, motion fidelity, and agreement in right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) stroke volume (SV) as a surrogate measure for accuracy were assessed. Exercise MR was repeated within 1 month for assessment of reproducibility. RESULTS: Imaging scores were superior for radial real-time k-t SENSE images (P < 0.001). Agreement in RV and LV SV during exercise was better with radial k-t real-time (SD of difference +/-3.43 vs. +/-8.97 mL; P < 0.001). Agreement in cardiac output (CO) in the same subject at two different imaging sessions was better for radial k-t SENSE. This was significant for the CO calculated for the RV (SD of difference +/-0.6 vs. +/-0.95 L/min; P = 0.01) and LV (+/-0.45 vs. +/-0.92 L/min; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radial k-t SENSE real-time imaging represents a feasible and reproducible imaging technique for biventricular assessment during exercise.
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of real-time radial k-t sensitivity encoding (SENSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for biventricular volumetric assessment during exercise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 12 healthy young adults underwent MRI at rest and during supine exercise at three different workload intensities. Biventricular volumes and function were assessed with 1) a radial k-t SENSE real-time sequence and 2) a scanner vendor supplied (standard) real-time sequence. Global image quality, motion fidelity, and agreement in right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) stroke volume (SV) as a surrogate measure for accuracy were assessed. Exercise MR was repeated within 1 month for assessment of reproducibility. RESULTS: Imaging scores were superior for radial real-time k-t SENSE images (P < 0.001). Agreement in RV and LV SV during exercise was better with radial k-t real-time (SD of difference +/-3.43 vs. +/-8.97 mL; P < 0.001). Agreement in cardiac output (CO) in the same subject at two different imaging sessions was better for radial k-t SENSE. This was significant for the CO calculated for the RV (SD of difference +/-0.6 vs. +/-0.95 L/min; P = 0.01) and LV (+/-0.45 vs. +/-0.92 L/min; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radial k-t SENSE real-time imaging represents a feasible and reproducible imaging technique for biventricular assessment during exercise.
Authors: Keith P George; Louise H Naylor; Greg P Whyte; Rob E Shave; David Oxborough; Daniel J Green Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Rhys I Beaudry; T Jake Samuel; Jing Wang; Wesley J Tucker; Mark J Haykowsky; Michael D Nelson Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Guido E Pieles; Gergely Szantho; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Christopher B Lawton; A Graham Stuart; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Mark S Turner; Craig A Williams; Robert M R Tulloh; Mark C K Hamilton Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Pei G Chew; Peter P Swoboda; Carrie Ferguson; Pankaj Garg; Abigail L Cook; Said Ibeggazene; Louise A E Brown; Thomas P Craven; James R Foley; Graham J Fent; Christopher E Saunderson; David M Higgins; Sven Plein; Karen M Birch; John P Greenwood Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2020-09
Authors: Francisco Contijoch; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; James J Pilla; Paul Yushkevich; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Harold Litt; Yuchi Han; Walter R T Witschey Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Philipp Lurz; Vivek Muthurangu; Pia K Schuler; Alessandro Giardini; Silvia Schievano; Johannes Nordmeyer; Sachin Khambadkone; Claudio Cappeli; Graham Derrick; Philipp Bonhoeffer; Andrew M Taylor Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Frances M Mitchell; Sanjay K Prasad; Gerald F Greil; Peter Drivas; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Claire E Raphael Journal: World J Clin Pediatr Date: 2016-02-08
Authors: Kristian H Mortensen; Alexander Jones; Jennifer A Steeden; Andrew M Taylor; Vivek Muthurangu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yu Y Li; Pengyue Zhang; Shams Rashid; Yang J Cheng; Wenhui Li; William Schapiro; Kathleen Gliganic; Ann-Marie Yamashita; Marie Grgas; Elizabeth Haag; J Jane Cao Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 2.546