Literature DB >> 19388113

Repeatability of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Michael J Paldino1, Daniel Barboriak, Annick Desjardins, Henry S Friedman, James J Vredenburgh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval and informed consent were obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Sixteen patients with glioblastoma multiforme underwent MR imaging at two time points without interval intervention. ADC and FA maps were registered to the contrast-enhanced and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image volumes. Volumes of tumor-related enhancement (TRE) and FLAIR signal abnormality (FSA) were defined using a semiautomated segmentation technique.
RESULTS: Repeated observations of mean ADC and mean FA were highly consistent within both TRE (ADC: r = 0.947,P < 0.0001; FA: r = 0.947, P < 0.0001) and FSA (ADC: r = 0.979, P < 0.0001; FA: r = 0.972, P < 0.0001). Within TRE, repeatability coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for change measured 0.104 x 10(-3) mm(2)S(-1) and 7.4% (ADC) and 0.0196 and 13.9% (FA), respectively. Within FSA, repeatability coefficients and 95% CI for change measured 0.071 x 10(-3) mm(2)S(-1) and 5.2% (ADC) and 0.0159 and 8.7% (FA), respectively. To detect 10% changes in mean ADC, sample sizes of nine (TRE) and six (FSA) patients would be required. The same change in mean FA would require sample sizes of 21 (TRE) and 10 (FSA) patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Changes after therapy greater than the repeatability coefficient or 95% CI for change are unlikely to be related to variability in the measurement of ADC and FA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19388113     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  19 in total

1.  Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy using a novel uncertainty analysis of MR diffusion in hippocampus, cingulum, and fornix, and hippocampal volume and FLAIR intensity.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Jason M Schwalb; Kost V Elisevich; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Hajar Hamidian; Ali-Reza Akhondi-Asl; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  ADC histograms predict response to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Martha Nowosielski; Wolfgang Recheis; Georg Goebel; Ozgür Güler; Gerd Tinkhauser; Herwig Kostron; Michael Schocke; Thaddaeus Gotwald; Günther Stockhammer; Markus Hutterer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in clinical trials of treatment response in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; John C Gore
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  A change in the apparent diffusion coefficient after treatment with bevacizumab is associated with decreased survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M J Paldino; A Desjardins; H S Friedman; J J Vredenburgh; D P Barboriak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume measurements help stratify progression-free survival of bevacizumab-treated patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Francesco Buemi; Giuseppe Guzzardi; Bruno Del Sette; Andrea P Sponghini; Roberta Matheoud; Eleonora Soligo; Alessandra Trisoglio; Alessandro Carriero; Alessandro Stecco
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-05-08

6.  Quantitative imaging to assess tumor response to therapy: common themes of measurement, truth data, and error sources.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Samuel G Armato; Charles P Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc M Bidaut; Daniel P Barboriak; Marios A Gavrielides; Edward F Jackson; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Paul E Kinahan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.

Authors:  Edward F Jackson; Daniel P Barboriak; Luc M Bidaut; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Repeatability of quantitative metrics derived from MR diffusion tractography in paediatric patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  M J Paldino; K Hedges; K M Rodrigues; D P Barboriak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Uncertainty in assessment of radiation-induced diffusion index changes in individual patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Christopher H Chapman; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Meta-analysis of diffusion metrics for the prediction of tumor grade in gliomas.

Authors:  V Z Miloushev; D S Chow; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.