INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps to distinguish anti-vascular and anti-tumor effects in the course of anti-angiogenic treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG) as compared to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed ADC maps from diffusion-weighted MRI in 14 rHGG patients during bevacizumab/irinotecan (B/I) therapy. Applying image segmentation, volumes of contrast-enhanced lesions in T1 sequences and of hyperintense T2 lesions (hT2) were calculated. hT2 were defined as regions of interest (ROI) and registered to corresponding ADC maps (hT2-ADC). Histograms were calculated from hT2-ADC ROIs. Thereafter, histogram asymmetry termed "skewness" was calculated and compared to progression-free survival (PFS) as defined by the Response Assessment Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group criteria. RESULTS: At 8-12 weeks follow-up, seven (50%) patients showed a partial response, three (21.4%) patients were stable, and four (28.6%) patients progressed according to RANO criteria. hT2-ADC histograms demonstrated statistically significant changes in skewness in relation to PFS at 6 months. Patients with increasing skewness (n = 11) following B/I therapy had significantly shorter PFS than did patients with decreasing or stable skewness values (n = 3, median percentage change in skewness 54% versus -3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In rHGG patients, the change in ADC histogram skewness may be predictive for treatment response early in the course of anti-angiogenic therapy and more sensitive than treatment assessment based solely on RANO criteria.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps to distinguish anti-vascular and anti-tumor effects in the course of anti-angiogenic treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGG) as compared to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed ADC maps from diffusion-weighted MRI in 14 rHGG patients during bevacizumab/irinotecan (B/I) therapy. Applying image segmentation, volumes of contrast-enhanced lesions in T1 sequences and of hyperintense T2 lesions (hT2) were calculated. hT2 were defined as regions of interest (ROI) and registered to corresponding ADC maps (hT2-ADC). Histograms were calculated from hT2-ADC ROIs. Thereafter, histogram asymmetry termed "skewness" was calculated and compared to progression-free survival (PFS) as defined by the Response Assessment Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group criteria. RESULTS: At 8-12 weeks follow-up, seven (50%) patients showed a partial response, three (21.4%) patients were stable, and four (28.6%) patients progressed according to RANO criteria. hT2-ADC histograms demonstrated statistically significant changes in skewness in relation to PFS at 6 months. Patients with increasing skewness (n = 11) following B/I therapy had significantly shorter PFS than did patients with decreasing or stable skewness values (n = 3, median percentage change in skewness 54% versus -3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In rHGG patients, the change in ADC histogram skewness may be predictive for treatment response early in the course of anti-angiogenic therapy and more sensitive than treatment assessment based solely on RANO criteria.
Authors: Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jeannette M Dowell; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; Melissa Wagner; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: G Manenti; M Di Roma; S Mancino; D A Bartolucci; G Palmieri; R Mastrangeli; R Miano; E Squillaci; G Simonetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A D Norden; G S Young; K Setayesh; A Muzikansky; R Klufas; G L Ross; A S Ciampa; L G Ebbeling; B Levy; J Drappatz; S Kesari; P Y Wen Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tina Young Poussaint; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Kelsey I Ricci; Ashok Panigrahy; Mehmet Kocak; Larry E Kun; James M Boyett; Ian F Pollack; Maryam Fouladi Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Xin Joe Qiao; Hyun J Kim; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Xi Xue; Benjamin M Ellingson; David Schiff; Dawit Aregawi; Soonmee Cha; Vinay K Puduvalli; Jing Wu; Wai-Kwan A Yung; Geoffrey S Young; James Vredenburgh; Dan Barboriak; Lauren E Abrey; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Nina A Paleologos; Patricia Lada; Michael Prados; Jonathan Goldin; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: M S Aboian; E Tong; D A Solomon; C Kline; A Gautam; A Vardapetyan; B Tamrazi; Y Li; C D Jordan; E Felton; B Weinberg; S Braunstein; S Mueller; S Cha Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fatima Tensaouti; Jonathan Khalifa; Amélie Lusque; Benjamin Plas; Jean Albert Lotterie; Isabelle Berry; Anne Laprie; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vincent Lubrano Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Reza Farjam; Christina I Tsien; Felix Y Feng; Diana Gomez-Hassan; James A Hayman; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 12.300