Literature DB >> 19386728

CT and MR imaging cochlear distance measurements may predict cochlear implant length required for a 360 degrees insertion.

S E J Connor1, D J Bell, R O'Gorman, A Fitzgerald-O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A preoperative prediction of the 360 degrees point insertion depth would aid the planning of electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) implantation. The purpose of this study was to establish whether the distance between the round window and the opposite cochlear wall on CT or MR imaging may be used to predict the length of a cochlear implant electrode array required to be inserted to the 360 degrees point of the basal turn.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT and MR imaging data were studied in 19 patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Distances were measured between the round window and the opposite outer cochlear wall on an oblique paracoronal reformatted image. Adjusted distance measurements were applied to a spiral function to estimate the length of an electrode array extending between the round window entry point and the 360 degrees point. This was compared with measurements of implant length to this insertion depth on postoperative CT.
RESULTS: Intraobserver reproducibility for each of the 2 observers was r = 0.85/0.55 for CT and r = 0.87/0.67 for MR imaging. Interobserver reproducibility was r = 0.68 for CT and r = 0.84 for MR imaging. There was no bias between CT and MR imaging measurements, with a mean difference of less than 0.1 mm. CT and MR imaging estimates markedly correlated with the actual length of the electrode array extending to the 360 degrees insertion depth (SD between the estimated and actual length was 0.84 mm for CT and 0.87 mm for MR imaging).
CONCLUSIONS: CT and MR imaging measures of cochlear distance (CD) were used to predict insertion depths to 360 degrees , and these were markedly concordant with the actual length of the electrode array required to reach this point. MR imaging measurements were more precise and similar in accuracy to those obtained with CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19386728     DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  10 in total

1.  Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT).

Authors:  C Güldner; S Wiegand; R Weiss; S Bien; A Sesterhenn; A Teymoortash; I Diogo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Relationship of cochlea with surrounding neurovascular structures and their implication in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Daisy Sahni; Anjali Singla; Ashok Gupta; Tulika Gupta; Anjali Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays.

Authors:  Thi Hau Vu; Chiara Perazzini; Mathilde Puechmaille; Aurélie Bachy; Aurélien Mulliez; Louis Boyer; Thierry Mom; Jean Gabrillargues
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Measuring the cochlea and cochlear implant electrode depth.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Guenette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Application of Curved MPR Algorithm to High Resolution 3 Dimensional T2 Weighted CISS Images for Virtual Uncoiling of Membranous Cochlea as an Aid for Cochlear Morphometry.

Authors:  Joish Upendra Kumar; Y Kavitha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 6.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Audiological Outcomes and Associated Factors after Pediatric Cochlear Reimplantation.

Authors:  Fabian Blanc; Catherine Blanchet; Marielle Sicard; Fanny Merklen; Frederic Venail; Michel Mondain
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Determination of Cochlear Duct Length With 3D Versus Two-dimensional Methods: A Retrospective Clinical Study of Imaging by Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Stephan Waldeck; Christian VON Falck; Rene Chapot; Marc Brockmann; Daniel Overhoff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice.

Authors:  P Pelliccia; F Venail; A Bonafé; M Makeieff; G Iannetti; M Bartolomeo; M Mondain
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes.

Authors:  Jafri Kuthubutheen; Amandeep Grewal; Sean Symons; Julian Nedzelski; David Shipp; Vincent Lin; Joseph Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.