Literature DB >> 19386548

Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (PCI 99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212, and IFCT 99-01): a randomised clinical trial.

Cécile Le Péchoux1, Ariane Dunant, Suresh Senan, Aaron Wolfson, Elisabeth Quoix, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Tudor Ciuleanu, Rodrigo Arriagada, Richard Jones, Rinus Wanders, Delphine Lerouge, Agnès Laplanche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimum dose of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown. A meta-analysis suggested that the incidence of brain metastases might be reduced with higher PCI doses. This randomised clinical trial compared the effect of standard versus higher PCI doses on the incidence of brain metastases.
METHODS: Between September, 1999, and December, 2005, 720 patients with limited-stage SCLC in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy from 157 centres in 22 countries were randomly assigned to a standard (n=360, 25 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 2.5 Gy) or higher PCI total dose (n=360, 36 Gy) delivered using either conventional (18 daily fractions of 2 Gy) or accelerated hyperfractionated (24 fractions in 16 days with two daily sessions of 1.5 Gy separated by a minimum interval of 6 h) radiotherapy. All of the treatment schedules excluded weekends. Randomisation was stratified according to medical centre, age (</=60 and >60 years), and interval between the start of induction treatment and the date of randomisation (</=90, 91-180, and >180 days). Eligible patients were randomised blindly by the data centre of the Institut Gustave Roussy (PCI99-01 and IFCT) using minimisation, and by the data centres of EORTC (EORTC ROG and LG) and RTOG (for CALGB, ECOG, RTOG, and SWOG), both using block stratification. The primary endpoint was the incidence of brain metastases at 2 years. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00005062.
FINDINGS: Five patients in the standard-dose group and four in the higher-dose group did not receive PCI; nonetheless, all randomised patients were included in the effectiveness anlysis. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 0-89 months), 145 patients had brain metastases; 82 in the standard-dose group and 63 in the higher-dose group. There was no significant difference in the 2-year incidence of brain metastases between the standard PCI dose group and the higher-dose group, at 29% (95% CI 24-35) and 23% (18-29), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.57-1.11], p=0.18). 226 patients in the standard-dose group and 252 in the higher-dose group died; 2-year overall survival was 42% (95% CI 37-48) in the standard-dose group and 37% (32-42) in the higher-dose group (HR 1.20 [1.00-1.44]; p=0.05). The lower overall survival in the higher-dose group is probably due to increased cancer-related mortality: 189 patients in the standard group versus 218 in the higher-dose group died of progressive disease. Five serious adverse events occurred in the standard-dose group versus zero in the higher-dose group. The most common acute toxic events were fatigue (106 [30%] patients in the standard-dose group vs 121 [34%] in the higher-dose group), headache (85 [24%] vs 99 [28%]), and nausea or vomiting (80 [23%] vs 101 [28%]).
INTERPRETATION: No significant reduction in the total incidence of brain metastases was observed after higher-dose PCI, but there was a significant increase in mortality. PCI at 25 Gy should remain the standard of care in limited-stage SCLC. FUNDING: Institut Gustave-Roussy, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (2001), Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (2007). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) contribution to this trial was supported by grants 5U10 CA11488-30 through 5U10 CA011488-38 from the US National Cancer Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19386548     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70101-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  91 in total

Review 1.  Current Treatments for Surgically Resectable, Limited-Stage, and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation: the state of the art and areas of uncertainty.

Authors:  S Vilar-González; J J Aristu-Mendioroz; A Pérez-Rozos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  FDG PET/CT metabolic tumour volume in small-cell lung cancer: better staging and prognostic stratification for an improved therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  D De Ruysscher; B Lueza; C Le Péchoux; D H Johnson; M O'Brien; N Murray; S Spiro; X Wang; M Takada; B Lebeau; W Blackstock; D Skarlos; P Baas; H Choy; A Price; L Seymour; R Arriagada; J-P Pignon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  The role of whole brain radiation therapy for the management of brain metastases in the era of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Eisuke Abe; Hidefumi Aoyama
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer 2013.

Authors:  M Dómine Gómez; T Morán Bueno; A Artal Cortés; J Remon Masip; P Lianes Barragán
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Progress in the management of limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Lauren A Byers; James W Welsh; Ritsuko U Komaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer: findings from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group pooled analysis.

Authors:  William G Rule; Nathan R Foster; Jeffrey P Meyers; Jonathan B Ashman; Sujay A Vora; Timothy F Kozelsky; Yolanda I Garces; James J Urbanic; Joseph K Salama; Steven E Schild
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  Treatment for small cell lung cancer, where are we now?-a review.

Authors:  Gabriela Alvarado-Luna; Daniela Morales-Espinosa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02

10.  A case of carcinomatous meningitis despite prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer during treatment with amrubicin.

Authors:  Tetsuya Oguri; Takehiro Uemura; Eiji Kunii; Hiroaki Ozasa; Hirotsugu Ohkubo; Mikinori Miyazaki; Ken Maeno; Shigeki Sato
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.