Literature DB >> 19386514

Fat containing HCC: findings on CT and MRI including serial contrast-enhanced imaging.

N Cem Balci1, Alex S Befeler, B Kirke Bieneman, Rana Fattahi, Sezer Saglam, Necat Havlioglu.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of fat containing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including serial contrast-enhanced imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging findings of 10 fat-containing HCCs on CT (n = 2) or MRI (n = 3) or on both CT and MRI (n = 5) were retrospectively reviewed in 9 patients. Both techniques included serial contrast enhanced imaging in arterial, portal venous, and late venous phases.
RESULTS: On non-contrast CT, fat containing HCC was either homogeneously hypodense (n = 6) or of mixed density (n = 1). The density values ranged between -11 and 9 HU. On MRI, homogenous (n = 4) or heterogeneous (n = 4) signal loss was observed on T1-weighted out-of-phase images as compared to in-phase images. Enhancement patterns on serial contrast-enhanced CT and MRI included: arterial enhancement indistinguishable from the liver with venous wash out (n = 2), arterial capillary blush with venous phase fading (n = 2), and heterogeneous arterial enhancement with unenhanced foci and venous phase wash out of enhancements. Larger lesions had late capsular enhancement.
CONCLUSIONS: Fat containing HCC has spectrum of imaging findings on CT and MRI. MRI with chemical shift technique depicts the fat content. Arterial contrast enhancement with venous washout or fading may help for the diagnosis of HCC in inconclusive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19386514     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  3 in total

1.  Chemical shift MR imaging methods for the quantification of transcatheter lipiodol delivery to the liver: preclinical feasibility studies in a rodent model.

Authors:  Xiaoming Yin; Yang Guo; Weiguo Li; Eugene Huo; Zhuoli Zhang; Jodi Nicolai; Robert A Kleps; Diego Hernando; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Evaluation of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging surveillance tool for hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients.

Authors:  Jing Kai Joel Liu; Chau Hung Lee; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 3.  Pearls and pitfalls in magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jelena Djokic Kovac; Tamara Milovanovic; Vladimir Dugalic; Igor Dumic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.