Literature DB >> 32798363

Evaluation of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging surveillance tool for hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients.

Jing Kai Joel Liu1, Chau Hung Lee1, Cher Heng Tan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as an imaging surveillance tool for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at-risk patients and to compare the performance of non-contrast MR imaging with ultrasonography (US) as a screening modality for the same.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with HCC between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were selected from our institution's cancer registry. Patients who underwent MR imaging and had US performed within three months of the MR imaging were included. For each MR imaging, two non-contrast MR imaging sequences - T2-weighted fat-saturated (T2-W FS) sequence and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) - were reviewed for the presence of suspicious lesions. A non-contrast MR image was considered positive if the lesion was seen on both sequences. The performance of non-contrast MR imaging was compared to that of hepatobiliary US for the detection of HCC.
RESULTS: A total of 73 patients with 108 HCCs were evaluated. Sensitivity of non-contrast MR imaging for the detection of HCC using T2-W FS and DWI was 93.2%, which was significantly higher than that of US, which was 79.5% (p = 0.02). In a subgroup of 55 patients with imaging features of liver cirrhosis, the sensitivity of non-contrast MR imaging was 90.9%, which was also significantly higher than that of US, which was 74.5% (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Our pilot study showed that non-contrast MR imaging, using a combination of T2-W FS and DWI, is a potential alternative to US as a screening tool for surveillance of patients at risk for HCC. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR imaging; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver; non-contrast; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32798363      PMCID: PMC9251266          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   3.331


  26 in total

1.  Comparative 13-year meta-analysis of the sensitivity and positive predictive value of ultrasound, CT, and MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert F Hanna; Vesselin Z Miloushev; An Tang; Lee A Finklestone; Sidney Z Brejt; Ranjit S Sandhu; Cynthia S Santillan; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01

Review 2.  LI-RADS Version 2018 Ancillary Features at MRI.

Authors:  Milena Cerny; Victoria Chernyak; Damien Olivié; Jean-Sébastien Billiard; Jessica Murphy-Lavallée; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Laurence Bourque; Jonathan C Hooker; Claude B Sirlin; An Tang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 4.  Ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. An overview.

Authors:  Mirela Dănilă; Ioan Sporea
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Laurentius A Lesmana; Ryosuke Tateishi; Pei-Jer Chen; Shi-Ming Lin; Haruhiko Yoshida; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Byung Ihn Choi; Ronnie T P Poon; Shuichiro Shiina; Ann Lii Cheng; Ji-Dong Jia; Shuntaro Obi; Kwang Hyub Han; Wasim Jafri; Pierce Chow; Seng Gee Lim; Yogesh K Chawla; Unggul Budihusodo; Rino A Gani; C Rinaldi Lesmana; Terawan Agus Putranto; Yun Fan Liaw; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  MRI of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Typical Features Are Less Frequent Below a Size Cutoff of 1.5 cm.

Authors:  Moon Hyung Choi; Joon-Il Choi; Young Joon Lee; Michael Yong Park; Sung Eun Rha; Chandana Lall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  MR Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Jonathon M Willatt; Hero K Hussain; Saroja Adusumilli; Jorge A Marrero
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MRI of Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Nils Albiin
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012-05

9.  Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance (MIRACLE-HCC): study protocol for a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Chansik An; Do Young Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Kwang Hyub Han; Yun Ho Roh; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Noninvasive imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: From diagnosis to prognosis.

Authors:  Han-Yu Jiang; Jie Chen; Chun-Chao Xia; Li-Kun Cao; Ting Duan; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.