| Literature DB >> 19386097 |
Pasha Razifar1, Joakim Hennings, Azita Monazzam, Per Hellman, Bengt Långström, Anders Sundin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In previous clinical Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies novel approaches for application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on dynamic PET images such as Masked Volume Wise PCA (MVW-PCA) have been introduced. MVW-PCA was shown to be a feasible multivariate analysis technique, which, without modeling assumptions, could extract and separate organs and tissues with different kinetic behaviors into different principal components (MVW-PCs) and improve the image quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19386097 PMCID: PMC2680831 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-9-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Figure 1First Column shows the summed images generated by summing images through frame 9–14 (15–45 min) and second column shows the corresponding MVW-PC1 images generated by application of MVW-PCA on the whole imaging sequence of 0–45 minutes. These are shown in the transaxial (first row) sagittal (second row), and coronal planes (third row).
Figure 2Visual comparison between the summed image (2a), corresponding MVW-PC1 image (2b), arbitrary chosen image of MVW-PC2 (2c) and MVW-PC3 (2d). Notably, the MVW-PC2 and MVW-PC3 images represent tissues with two different and uncorrelated tracer pharmacokinetics compared to MVW-PC1 images. In MVW-PC2, the early pharmacokinetic events are displayed showing the parenchymal tracer accumulation in the kidneys. In MVW-PC3, the pharmacokinetic events are displayed and clearly demonstrate the [11C]-MTO characteristic accumulation of radioactivity in the gastric juice.
Figure 3Bar chart showing the SUV of a normal adrenal gland (upper chart) and an adrenocortical adenoma (lower chart) for each patient as obtained by using the "hot spot" method defined in both the summed and MVW-PC1 image in the MTO-PET examination in the untreated and treated state.
Results obtained from applying one-way ANOVA to the mean SUVs using the "hot spot" method, representing adrenocortical adenomas and normal adrenal glands defined in MVW-PC1 and summed images, respectively.
| Comparison | Significant | |
|---|---|---|
| MVW-PC1, untreat, Adenoma vs MVW-PC1, treated, adenoma | No | 1.171 |
| MVW-PC1, untreat, Adenoma vs MVW-PC1, untreated, normal | No | 6.771 |
| SUM, untreated, adenoma vs SUM, treated, adenoma | No | 1.143 |
| SUM, untreated, adenoma vs SUM, untreated, normal | No | 6.843 |
| MVW-PC1, treated, adenoma vs MVW-PC1, treated, normal | No | 6.943 |
| SUM, treated, adenoma vs SUM, treated, normal | No | 7.014 |
| MVW-PC1, untreated, normal vs MVW-PC1, treated, normal | No | 1.343 |
| SUM, untreated, normal vs SUM, treated, normal | No | 1.314 |
Figure 4Regression analysis of the SUVs obtained using the "hot spot" method defined in the MVW-PC1 images when plotted against the SUVs obtained using ROIs defined in the summed images shown for the adrenocortical adenomas (dots) and the normal adrenal glands (triangles).
Parameters obtained when performing regression analysis of the SUVs obtained using the "hot spot" method defined in the MVW-PC1 images vs. the SUVs obtained using ROIs defined in the summed images.
| Question | Parameters | value |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit value | Slope | 0.9972 ± 0.001907 |
| Best fit value | 1/slope | 1.003 |
| 95% Confidence Intervals | Slope | 0.9931 to 1.001 |
| Is slope significantly non-zero? | T | 523 |
| Is slope significantly non-zero? | DF | 13.00 |
| Is slope significantly non-zero? | P Value | <0.0001 |
| Is slope significantly non-zero? | Deviation from zero? | Significant |
Figure 5Mean TACs of all patients (error bars have been omitted for clarity), demonstrating the pharmacokinetic behavior of [.
Figure 6Bar chart shows the mean SUVs of 7 patients calculated in ROIs representing the adrenocortical adenomas and normal adrenal glands. The means are defined in both the summed and MVW-PC1 images, using the 50% cut-off method before and after cortisone treatment.
Results obtained from applying a paired t-test on the mean SUVs calculated from ROIs (50% cut-off method) representing adrenocortical adenomas and normal adrenal glands defined in MVW-PC1 and summed images, respectively.
| Comparison | Significant | Mean difference |
|---|---|---|
| Untreated vs. treated, MVW-PC1, normal | Yes | 2.3 |
| Untreated vs. treated, SUM, normal | No | 1.054 |
| Untreated vs. treated MVW-PCA, adenoma | Yes | 1.503 |
| Untreated vs. treated, SUM, adenoma | No | 1.272 |
Results obtained from applying a two-tailed t-test on the mean difference in percent of SUVs calculated from ROIs (50% cut-off method) representing adrenocortical adenomas and normal adrenal glands defined in MVW-PC1 and summed images, respectively.
| Comparison | P value | Mean ± SEM of MVW-PC1, SUM |
|---|---|---|
| MVW-PC1, adenoma,% vs SUM, adenoma,% | 0.2906 | 12.78 ± 1.258, 10.90 ± 1.213 |
| MVW-PC1, normal,% vs SUM, normal,% | 0.0002 | 22.59 ± 1.711, 11.91 ± 1.731 |