Literature DB >> 19385944

Utility of mass spectrometry for proteome analysis: part II. Ion-activation methods, statistics, bioinformatics and annotation.

Farid E Ahmed1.   

Abstract

This is the second article in a series, intended as a tutorial to provide the interested reader with an overview of the concepts not covered in part I, such as: the principles of ion-activation methods, the ability of mass-spectrometric methods to interface with various proteomic strategies, analysis techniques, bioinformatics and data interpretation and annotation. Although these are different topics, it is important that a reader has a basic and collective understanding of all of them for an overall appreciation of how to carry out and analyze a proteomic experiment. Different ion-activation methods for MS/MS, such as collision-induced dissociation (including postsource decay) and surface-induced dissociation, electron capture and electron-transfer dissociation, infrared multiphoton and blackbody infrared radiative dissociation have been discussed since they are used in proteomic research. The high dimensionality of data generated from proteomic studies requires an understanding of the underlying analytical procedures used to obtain these data, as well as the development of improved bioinformatics tools and data-mining approaches for efficient and accurate statistical analyses of biological samples from healthy and diseased individuals, in addition to determining the utility of the interpreted data. Currently available strategies for the analysis of the proteome by mass spectrometry, such as those employed for the analysis of substantially purified proteins and complex peptide mixtures, as well as hypothesis-driven strategies, have been elaborated upon. Processing steps prior to the analysis of mass spectrometry data, statistics and the several informatics steps currently used for the analysis of shotgun proteomic experiments, as well as proteomics ontology, are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19385944     DOI: 10.1586/epr.09.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics        ISSN: 1478-9450            Impact factor:   3.940


  3 in total

Review 1.  Crustacean neuropeptides.

Authors:  Andrew E Christie; Elizabeth A Stemmler; Patsy S Dickinson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Urinary proteomics as a novel tool for biomarker discovery in kidney diseases.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Yi-ding Chen; Wei Gu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Quantification and deconvolution of asymmetric LC-MS peaks using the bi-Gaussian mixture model and statistical model selection.

Authors:  Tianwei Yu; Hesen Peng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.