Literature DB >> 19385865

Informed consent in international health research.

Patricia A Marshall1.   

Abstract

Informed consent is universally recognized as a central component of ethical conduct in scientific research. Investigators working with diverse populations throughout the world face myriad challenges. The application of standards for informed consent can be daunting for researchers when they face the pragmatic constraints of the field and the reality of cultural beliefs about consent that may be in direct conflict with regulatory requirements. This paper explores cultural and social factors underlying informed consent for health research with diverse populations in international settings. Sociocultural influences on comprehension of information, perceptions of risk, and beliefs regarding decisional authority are reviewed. The implications of power inequities between study sponsors, researchers and participants are also considered. Issues associated with the development and preparation of consent forms, including translation and documentation are highlighted. Recommendations for good practices are outlined and future directions for research are explored.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19385865     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  32 in total

1.  Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research.

Authors:  Charles N Rotimi; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments.

Authors:  Susan Bull; Bobbie Farsides; Fasil Tekola Ayele
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Marissa Jones; Wylie Burke; Dean Baker; James M Swanson
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research.

Authors:  Patricia A Marshall; Clement A Adebamowo; Adebowale A Adeyemo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Mirjana Vekich; Teri Strenski; Jie Zhou; T Elaine Prewitt; Richard S Cooper; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Pediatric clinical drug trials in low-income countries: key ethical issues.

Authors:  S M MacLeod; D C Knoppert; M Stanton-Jean; D Avard
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Traditional, complementary, and alternative medical cures for HIV: rationale and implications for HIV cure research.

Authors:  Xin Pan; Alice Zhang; Gail E Henderson; Stuart Rennie; Chuncheng Liu; Weiping Cai; Feng Wu; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: existing regulations or further protections?

Authors:  Stephanie R Solomon
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-02

8.  Unequal treatment of human research subjects.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02

9.  Taking social relationships seriously: lessons learned from the informed consent practices of a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast.

Authors:  Caroline Gikonyo; Philip Bejon; Vicki Marsh; Sassy Molyneux
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya.

Authors:  Rachel Vreeman; Eunice Kamaara; Allan Kamanda; David Ayuku; Winstone Nyandiko; Lukoye Atwoli; Samuel Ayaya; Peter Gisore; Michael Scanlon; Paula Braitstein
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.