Literature DB >> 19385847

Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials.

Paul R Helft1, Victoria L Champion, Rachael Eckles, Cynthia S Johnson, Eric M Meslin.   

Abstract

THE POLICY DEBATE CONCERNING INFORMED consent for future, unspecified research of stored human biological materials (HBM) would benefit from an understanding of the attitudes of individuals who contribute tissue specimens to HBM repositories. Cancer patients who contributed leftover tissue to the Indiana University Cancer Center Tissue Bank under such conditions were recruited for a mail survey study of their attitudes. Our findings suggest that a clear majority of subjects would permit unlimited future research on stored HBMs without re-contact and reconsent, and a significant minority appear to desire ongoing control over future research uses of their tissue. These differences merit further investigation and suggest that a policy of blanket consent for all future, unspecified research would be premature.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19385847     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.3.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  20 in total

1.  The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Kyle B Brothers; Nathaniel D Mercaldo; Ellen Wright Clayton; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Sharon A Aufox; Murray H Brilliant; Diego Campos; David S Carrell; John Connolly; Pat Conway; Stephanie M Fullerton; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Carol R Horowitz; Gail P Jarvik; David Kaufman; Terrie E Kitchner; Rongling Li; Evette J Ludman; Catherine A McCarty; Jennifer B McCormick; Valerie D McManus; Melanie F Myers; Aaron Scrol; Janet L Williams; Martha J Shrubsole; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Maureen E Smith; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Stem cell policy exceptionalism: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Lomax; Steven R Peckman
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Ethical considerations in the collection of genetic data from critically ill patients: what do published studies reveal about potential directions for empirical ethics research?

Authors:  B D Freeman; C R Kennedy; H L Frankel; B Clarridge; D Bolcic-Jankovic; E Iverson; E Shehane; A Celious; B A Zehnbauer; T G Buchman
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Van Lieou; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Cancer patient perceptions about biobanking and preferred timing of consent.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Joann U Tsark; Amy Powers; Kristen Croom; Robert Kim; Francine C Gachupin; Paul Morris
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.

Authors:  E Vermeulen; M K Schmidt; N K Aaronson; M Kuenen; M-J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; H van der Poel; S Horenblas; H Boot; V J Verwaal; A Cats; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Ethical issues in measuring biomarkers in children's environmental health.

Authors:  Peter D Sly; Brenda Eskenazi; Jenny Pronczuk; Radim Srám; Fernando Diaz-Barriga; Diego Gonzalez Machin; David O Carpenter; Simona Surdu; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.