| Literature DB >> 19384619 |
H V Kurup1, V M Mandalia, K A Shaju, B Singh, A R Beaumont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out whether distal radius fractures treated by Kirschner wire (K wire) fixation loose reduction after wire removal and analyze the variables may influence this.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19384619 PMCID: PMC2656956 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-008-0005-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Traumatol ISSN: 1590-9921
Loss of angles and age/sex
| Category (number of patients) | Loss of angles—mean (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial tilt° | Ulnar variance (mm) | Dorsal tilt° | |
| <65 years (33) | 2.2 (0–12) | 1.1 (0–4) | 2.2 (0–12) |
| ≥65 years (26) | 2.0 (0–30) | 1.5 (0–10) | 3.1 (0–12) |
| 0.967 | 0.927 | 0.164 | |
| Male (20) | 2.3 (0–12) | 1.4 (0–4) | 2.1 (0–12) |
| Female (39) | 2.8 (0–30) | 1.3 (0–10) | 2.9 (0–12) |
| 0.585 | 0.927 | 0.164 | |
| All patients (59) | 2.6 (0–30) | 1.3 (0–10) | 2.6 (0–12) |
Loss of angles and AO class
| AO class (number of patients) | Loss of angles—mean (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial tilt° | Ulnar variance (mm) | Dorsal tilt° | |
| A2 (10) | 5.4 (0–30) | 1.1 (0–2) | 2.7 (0–12) |
| A3 (18) | 1.7 (0–4) | 1.2 (0–4) | 3.4 (0–12) |
| C1 (14) | 1.8 (0–6) | 0.9 (0–2) | 2.5 (0–8) |
| C2 (12) | 1.5 (0–6) | 1.8 (0–10) | 1.6 (0–6) |
| C3 (5) | 4 (0–12) | 1.2 (0–4) | 3.0 (0–4) |
| 0.106 | 0.795 | 0.528 | |
Loss of angles and timing of wire removal
| Timing of K-wire removal (number of patients) | Loss of angles—mean (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial tilt° | Ulnar variance (mm) | Dorsal tilt° | |
| 4 weeks (8) | 1.5 (0–4) | 0.9 (0–4) | 1.5 (0–4) |
| 5 weeks (12) | 3.6 (0–12) | 1.0 (0–2) | 3.2 (0–12) |
| 6 weeks (33) | 1.8 (0–6) | 1.2 (0–8) | 2.7 (0–12) |
| >6 weeks (6) | 6.7 (0–30) | 2.7 (0–10) | 2.2 (0–4) |
| 0.075 | 0.235 | 0.565 | |