Literature DB >> 19380407

PET/CT for therapy response assessment in lymphoma.

Martin Hutchings1, Sally F Barrington.   

Abstract

PET with (18)F-FDG is a standard staging procedure for most lymphoma subtypes. Performed during and after therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), (18)F-FDG PET results have a high prognostic value and correlate with survival. (18)F-FDG PET has been incorporated into revised response criteria for aggressive lymphomas, and several ongoing trials are under way to investigate the value of treatment adaptation based on early (18)F-FDG PET results for HL and aggressive NHL. There is little evidence to support the use of (18)F-FDG PET for monitoring of the treatment of indolent lymphomas and for routine use in the surveillance setting. So that trial results can be compared and translated easily into clinical practice, uniform and evidence-based guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of response monitoring scans are warranted. Because it is still not proven that the use of interim (18)F-FDG PET can improve patient outcomes, we recommend examination of the use of (18)F-FDG PET for response monitoring in appropriately designed clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380407     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  54 in total

1.  Role of [18F]-FDG-PET/MDCT in evaluating early response in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  A Orlacchio; O Schillaci; E Gaspari; F Della Gatta; R Danieli; F Bolacchi; C Ragano Caracciolo; A Mancini; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Personalized versus evidence-based medicine with PET-based imaging.

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Wendi Qian; Edward J Somer; Antonella Franceschetto; Bruno Bagni; Eva Brun; Helén Almquist; Annika Loft; Liselotte Højgaard; Massimo Federico; Andrea Gallamini; Paul Smith; Peter Johnson; John Radford; Michael J O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (99 m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Byung Hyun Byun; Chang-Bae Kong; Ilhan Lim; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Won Seok Song; Wan Hyeong Cho; Dae-Geun Jeon; Jae-Soo Koh; Soo-Yong Lee; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Early FDG-PET response-adapted risk stratification and further therapeutic decision-making in lymphoma: will this replace the established prognostic indices and be the standard-of-care in clinical management?

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Radioguided lymph node biopsy of a chemoresistant lymph node detected on interim FDG PET-CT in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Tamás Györke; Attila Kollár; Gyula Bottlik; Ágota Szepesi; Imre Bodó; Tamás Masszi; Viktor Bérczi; Ildikó Garai
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 7.  [Oncological imaging for therapy response assessment].

Authors:  J Stattaus
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Baseline metabolic tumour volume is an independent prognostic factor in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Salim Kanoun; Cédric Rossi; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Alexandre Cochet; Olivier Humbert; Michel Toubeau; Emmanuelle Ferrant; François Brunotte; René-Olivier Casasnovas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT findings of retroperitoneal tumors: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Atsushi Kono; Jyunya Konishi; Yuko Suenaga; Satoru Takahashi; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 10.  RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline.

Authors:  Els L van Persijn van Meerten; Hans Gelderblom; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.