Literature DB >> 19379040

Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects.

Stephen J Lupker1, Colin J Davis.   

Abstract

An orthographically similar masked nonword prime facilitates responding in a lexical decision task (Forster & Davis, 1984). Recently, this masked priming paradigm has been used to evaluate models of orthographic coding--odels that attempt to quantify prime-target similarity. One general finding is that priming effects often do not occur when prime-target similarity is moderate, a result that the authors interpret as being due to uncontrolled effects of lexical inhibition. In the present research, a new version of the masked priming paradigm, sandwich priming, was introduced in an effort to minimize the impact of lexical inhibition. Masked sandwich priming involves briefly presenting the target itself prior to the presentation of each prime. Results indicate that the new paradigm was successful. The predicted priming effects were observed for Guerrera and Forster's (2008) T-All primes (e.g., avacitno-VACATION) and for primes differing from their targets at 3 letter positions (e.g., coshure-CAPTURE)-effects that are not found with the conventional masked priming paradigm. In addition to demonstrating the usefulness of the sandwich priming technique, these results also support the assumption that inhibitory processes play an important role in lexical processing. Copyright APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19379040     DOI: 10.1037/a0015278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming.

Authors:  Maria Ktori; Brechtsje Kingma; Thomas Hannagan; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-08-01

2.  An ERP investigation of orthographic precision in deaf and hearing readers.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Orthographic similarity: the case of "reversed anagrams".

Authors:  Alison L Morris; Mary L Still
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

4.  Eyes wide open: Pupil size as a proxy for inhibition in the masked-priming paradigm.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Mary L Still; Alison L Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

5.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

6.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Itamar Lerner; Blair C Armstrong; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The "electrophysiological sandwich": a method for amplifying ERP priming effects.

Authors:  Maria Ktori; Jonathan Grainger; Stéphane Dufau; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Searching beyond the looking glass with sandwich priming.

Authors:  Brice Brossette; Stéphanie Massol; Bernard Lété
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Letter order is not coded by open bigrams.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  A backwards glance at words: Using reversed-interior masked primes to test models of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.