Literature DB >> 19377325

Indicator madness: a cautionary reflection on the use of indicators in healthcare.

Sarah Bowen1, Sara A Kreindler.   

Abstract

Indicators are increasingly being used to monitor and evaluate health system performance. However, although indicators can provide valuable information, they also have limitations. The benefits of indicators are vitiated when they are seriously flawed (unreliable, invalid or easily "gamed"), selected before the right question has been posed or used to the exclusion of other sources of information. This critical assessment of the use and misuse of indicators employs practical examples from a Canadian health authority to illustrate common pitfalls. It concludes with some solutions to optimize the benefits of indicator use.
Copyright © 2008 Longwoods Publishing.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19377325      PMCID: PMC2645155     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  6 in total

1.  Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals: a comparison of Joint Commission and Medicare outcomes scores in hospitals.

Authors:  John R Griffith; Steven R Knutzen; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.926

2.  Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Knowledge and behaviour for a sustainable improvement culture.

Authors:  Paul Walley; Kate Silvester; Richard Steyn
Journal:  Healthc Pap       Date:  2006

4.  More than "using research": the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making.

Authors:  Sarah Bowen; Tannis Erickson; Patricia J Martens; Susan Crockett
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-02

Review 5.  Research evidence on the validity of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care.

Authors:  J W Thomas; T P Hofer
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.929

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Audit of renal drug dosing: comparison of 2 methods and evaluation of pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour.

Authors:  Kimberley L Caouette; Colette B Raymond; Lindsay D Meyer; Nicholas Honcharik
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.