Literature DB >> 11799828

Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals: a comparison of Joint Commission and Medicare outcomes scores in hospitals.

John R Griffith1, Steven R Knutzen, Jeffrey A Alexander.   

Abstract

Outcomes performance measures are increasingly important in health care. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (Joint Commission) continues to rely on structure and process measures based on accepted good practice. One of the first tasks in moving to a more outcomes-oriented approach is to compare the two measurement approaches. This article compares seven non-federal general hospital performance measures derived from Medicare against Joint Commission scores. Joint Commission measures are generally not correlated with outcome measures. The few significant correlations that appear are often counterintuitive. We conclude that a potentially serious disjuncture exists between the outcomes measures and Joint Commission evaluations.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11799828     DOI: 10.1097/00019514-200210020-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  18 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian methods in reporting and managing Australian clinical indicators.

Authors:  Peter P Howley; Stephen J Hancock; Robert W Gibberd; Sheuwen Chuang; Frank A Tuyl
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines.

Authors:  Orville Solon; Kimberly Woo; Stella A Quimbo; Riti Shimkhada; Jhiedon Florentino; John W Peabody
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  Indicator madness: a cautionary reflection on the use of indicators in healthcare.

Authors:  Sarah Bowen; Sara A Kreindler
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-05

4.  Perioperative and ICU Healthcare Analytics within a Veterans Integrated System Network: a Qualitative Gap Analysis.

Authors:  Seshadri Mudumbai; Ferenc Ayer; Jerry Stefanko
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Health Care Accreditation Mod-els.

Authors:  Jafar S Tabrizi; Farid Gharibi; Andrew J Wilson
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2011-07-25

6.  Demand-driven care and hospital choice. Dutch health policy toward demand-driven care: results from a survey into hospital choice.

Authors:  Christiaan J Lako; Pauline Rosenau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-07-19

Review 7.  Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Abdullah Alkhenizan; Charles Shaw
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Hospital performance trends on national quality measures and the association with Joint Commission accreditation.

Authors:  Stephen P Schmaltz; Scott C Williams; Mark R Chassin; Jerod M Loeb; Robert M Wachter
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737].

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Johanna Westbrook; Marjorie Pawsey; David Greenfield; Justine Naylor; Rick Iedema; Bill Runciman; Sally Redman; Christine Jorm; Maureen Robinson; Sally Nathan; Robert Gibberd
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  An effectiveness analysis of healthcare systems using a systems theoretic approach.

Authors:  Sheuwen Chuang; Kerry Inder
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.