Sze Y Liu1, Kate L Lapane. 1. Department of Community Health, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI 02903, USA. sze_liu@brown.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of residential modification on decreasing risk of physical function decline in 2 years. DESIGN: Cohort study using propensity scores method to control for baseline differences between individuals with residential modifications and those without residential modifications. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N = 9,447) were from the Second Longitudinal Study on Aging, a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population, aged 70 years and older in the United States at the time of baseline interview in 1994-1995. METHODS: Participants self-reported residential modifications at baseline (e.g., railings, bathroom modifications). Decline in physical functioning was measured by comparing self-reported activities of daily living at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with individuals without baseline modifications, a higher proportion of those with baseline modifications were aged 85 years and older (16% vs. 10%), used special aides (36% vs. 14%), and lived alone (40% vs. 31%). Using a weighted propensity score method, we found a modest decrease in risk of decline at Wave 2 for those with baseline modifications (risk difference = 3.1%). Respondents with a baseline residential modification were less likely to experience subsequent decline in functional ability (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.97) after adjusting for quintile of propensity score in a survey-weighted regression model. IMPLICATIONS: Baseline modifications may be associated with reduced risk of decline among a nationally representative sample of older community-dwelling adults. Widespread adoption of residential modifications may reduce the overall population estimates of decline.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of residential modification on decreasing risk of physical function decline in 2 years. DESIGN: Cohort study using propensity scores method to control for baseline differences between individuals with residential modifications and those without residential modifications. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N = 9,447) were from the Second Longitudinal Study on Aging, a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population, aged 70 years and older in the United States at the time of baseline interview in 1994-1995. METHODS:Participants self-reported residential modifications at baseline (e.g., railings, bathroom modifications). Decline in physical functioning was measured by comparing self-reported activities of daily living at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with individuals without baseline modifications, a higher proportion of those with baseline modifications were aged 85 years and older (16% vs. 10%), used special aides (36% vs. 14%), and lived alone (40% vs. 31%). Using a weighted propensity score method, we found a modest decrease in risk of decline at Wave 2 for those with baseline modifications (risk difference = 3.1%). Respondents with a baseline residential modification were less likely to experience subsequent decline in functional ability (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.97) after adjusting for quintile of propensity score in a survey-weighted regression model. IMPLICATIONS: Baseline modifications may be associated with reduced risk of decline among a nationally representative sample of older community-dwelling adults. Widespread adoption of residential modifications may reduce the overall population estimates of decline.
Authors: Margaret G Stineman; Dawei Xie; Qiang Pan; Jibby E Kurichi; Debra Saliba; Joel Streim Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hillary R Bogner; Heather F de Vries McClintock; Jibby E Kurichi; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Sean Hennessy; Joel E Streim; Margaret G Stineman Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Margaret G Stineman; Dawei Xie; Joel E Streim; Qiang Pan; Jibby E Kurichi; John T Henry-Sánchez; Zi Zhang; Debra Saliba Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Laura M Welti; Kristen M Beavers; Annie Mampieri; Stephen R Rapp; Edward Ip; Sally A Shumaker; Daniel P Beavers Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.053