Literature DB >> 19376512

Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States.

Barbara Luke1, Morton B Brown, David A Grainger, Marcelle Cedars, Nancy Klein, Judy E Stern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with the use of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) and its effect on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome.
DESIGN: Historical cohort.
SETTING: Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S): A total of 69,028 ART cycles of autologous fresh embryo transfers with additional embryos cryopreserved during the same cycle performed during 2004-06 and reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Factors associated with the number of embryos transferred, and the odds of pregnancy, live birth, and multiple-infant live birth by number of embryos transferred as adjusted odds ratios (AORs). RESULT(S): Single embryo transfer was used more with uterine factor (AOR 1.76) and less with male factor, endometriosis, or tubal factor (AOR 0.81, 0.72, 0.83, respectively). Compared with women aged <30 years, eSET was used less among women aged 35-39 years and > or =40 years (AOR 0.74 and 0.39, respectively). Compared with White women, eSET was used more with Asian (AOR 1.52) and less with Black or Hispanic women (AOR 0.73 and 0.67, respectively). Compared with eSET, the likelihood of pregnancy, live birth, or multiple-infant live birth was more likely with two embryos (AOR 1.33, 1.34, and 27.4, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Elective SET, used more for younger women with specific diagnoses, is associated with slightly reduced likelihood of a live birth but much reduced likelihood of multiples. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376512     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Don't Give Up! A Cyber-ethnography and Discourse Analysis of an Online Infertility Patient Forum.

Authors:  Mihan Lee
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09

2.  Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; William Gibbons; Glenn L Schattman; Rogerio A Lobo; Richard E Leach; Judy E Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one.

Authors:  John M Csokmay; Micah J Hill; Rebecca J Chason; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jacques Cohen; Alan H Decherney; James H Segars; Mark D Payson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa F Wellons; Victor Y Fujimoto; Valerie L Baker; Debbie S Barrington; Diana Broomfield; William H Catherino; Gloria Richard-Davis; Mary Ryan; Kim Thornton; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010.

Authors:  Marissa L Steinberg; Sheree Boulet; Dmitry Kissin; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  An Infertile Couple's Long and Expensive Path to Varicocele Repair.

Authors:  Adithya Balasubramanian; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Jason M Scovell; Jonathan Lo; Byung Ji; Elizabeth L Godfrey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Tubal Factor Infertility, In Vitro Fertilization, and Racial Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort in Two US Clinics.

Authors:  Gloria E Anyalechi; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Dmitry M Kissin; Catherine L Haggerty; Karen R Hammond; Edward W Hook; Kyle T Bernstein; Michael P Steinkampf; William M Geisler
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  The presence of multiple gestational sacs confers a higher live birth rate in women with infertility who achieve a positive pregnancy test after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective local cohort.

Authors:  Erika Balassiano; Shaveta Malik; Praful Vaid; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.