Literature DB >> 19373468

A comparison of four different HRQoL generic questionnaire in five different patient groups.

Lale Akbulut Aktekin1, Filiz Eser, Simten Malhan, Ergun Öksüz, Dilek Keskin, Hatice Bodur.   

Abstract

Most of musculoskeletal diseases involve pain and reduced physical functioning. Recognition of the coexistence of more than one musculoskeletal disease is important because they are relatively common and has a substantial impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aim was to compare the results of four generic QoL questionnaires--QoL-5, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Short Form (SF)-6D, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)--in five different patient groups. Two hundred and one patients representing five different disease groups (knee osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, back pain, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis), randomly selected through the Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic, were included in the study. Scores indicating low QoL for each of the five diseases compared are reported. Patients in each disease group stated high disability. No strong correlation between any of the scales could be determined, and NHP was identified as the only scale able to differentiate between the diseases. Many instruments are available for measuring HRQoL. The QoL-5, NHP, SF-6D, and VAS are four commonly used generic (i.e., not disease-specific) measures for quantifying HRQoL in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Most studies have focused on only one musculoskeletal disease, but comorbidity of musculoskeletal disorders is common. We emphasize in this study the effect of multiple musculoskeletal diseases on HRQoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19373468     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-0912-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  15 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study.

Authors:  S M Hunt; S P McKenna; J McEwen; E M Backett; J Williams; E Papp
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of disease activity and outcome in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D A Houssien; S P McKenna; D L Scott
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-01

5.  Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  M Fransen; J Edmonds
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Functional disability and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Elif E Bostan; Pinar Borman; Hatice Bodur; Nurdan Barça
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  The Nottingham Health Profile in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with other health status measurements and clinical variables.

Authors:  F Sivas; O Erçin; O Tanyolaç; N Barça; S Aydoğ; K Ozoran
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Cross-cultural validation and analysis of responsiveness of the QUALIOST: QUAlity of Life questionnaire In OSTeoporosis.

Authors:  Christine de la Loge; Kate Sullivan; Robert Pinkney; Patrick Marquis; Christian Roux; Pierre Jean Meunier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire: initial report.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Eiji Wada; Kazuo Yonenobu; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  4 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis, fibromyalgia syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with a selected sample of healthy ındividuals.

Authors:  Nimet Ovayolu; Ozlem Ovayolu; Gülendam Karadag
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The impact of axial spondyloarthritis on quality of life (QoL): a comparison with the impact of moderate to end-stage chronic kidney disease on QoL.

Authors:  Yu Heng Kwan; Warren Fong; Priscilla How; Hwee-Lin Wee; Ying Ying Leung; Jie Kie Phang; Nai Lee Lui; Chuen Seng Tan; Rahul Malhotra; Truls Østbye; Julian Thumboo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis patients: comparison between Spanish and Brazilian sample.

Authors:  Maiza Ritomy Ide; Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Kelly Cristina Yano; Marcelo Jun Imai; Mario Chueire de Andrade; Javier Llorca
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Quality of life assessment in interstitial lung diseases:a comparison of the disease-specific K-BILD with the generic EQ-5D-5L.

Authors:  Boglárka Lilla Szentes; Michael Kreuter; Thomas Bahmer; Surinder S Birring; Martin Claussen; Julia Waelscher; Reiner Leidl; Larissa Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2018-05-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.