Literature DB >> 19372649

Mastoid cavity dimensions and shape: method of measurement and virtual fitting of implantable devices.

Ophir Handzel1, Haobing Wang, Jason Fiering, Jeffrey T Borenstein, Mark J Mescher, Erin E Leary Swan, Brian A Murphy, Zhiqiang Chen, Marcello Peppi, William F Sewell, Sharon G Kujawa, Michael J McKenna.   

Abstract

Temporal bone implants can be used to electrically stimulate the auditory nerve, to amplify sound, to deliver drugs to the inner ear and potentially for other future applications. The implants require storage space and access to the middle or inner ears. The most acceptable space is the cavity created by a canal wall up mastoidectomy. Detailed knowledge of the available space for implantation and pathways to access the middle and inner ears is necessary for the design of implants and successful implantation. Based on temporal bone CT scans a method for three-dimensional reconstruction of a virtual canal wall up mastoidectomy space is described. Using Amira software the area to be removed during such surgery is marked on axial CT slices, and a three-dimensional model of that space is created. The average volume of 31 reconstructed models is 12.6 cm(3) with standard deviation of 3.69 cm(3), ranging from 7.97 to 23.25 cm(3). Critical distances were measured directly from the model and their averages were calculated: height 3.69 cm, depth 2.43 cm, length above the external auditory canal (EAC) 4.45 cm and length posterior to EAC 3.16 cm. These linear measurements did not correlate well with volume measurements. The shape of the models was variable to a significant extent making the prediction of successful implantation for a given design based on linear and volumetric measurement unreliable. Hence, to assure successful implantation, preoperative assessment should include a virtual fitting of an implant into the intended storage space. The above-mentioned three-dimensional models were exported from Amira to a Solidworks application where virtual fitting was performed. Our results are compared to other temporal bone implant virtual fitting studies. Virtual fitting has been suggested for other human applications. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19372649      PMCID: PMC2712579          DOI: 10.1159/000212110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  12 in total

1.  Computer-aided surgical planning for implantation of hearing aids based on CT data in a VR environment.

Authors:  F Dammann; A Bode; E Schwaderer; M Schaich; M Heuschmid; M M Maassen
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  3D reconstruction of the structure of a residual limb for customising the design of a prosthetic socket.

Authors:  Zheng Shuxian; Zhao Wanhua; Lu Bingheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 3.  Implantable middle ear hearing devices: current state of technology and market challenges.

Authors:  Douglas D Backous; William Duke
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Preoperative assessment of the implantable middle ear pump system using CT scans and conventional X-rays of the temporal bone.

Authors:  M M Maassen; R Lehner; R Lüdtke; M Strayle-Batra; H P Zenner
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.697

5.  A totally implantable drug delivery system for local therapy of the middle and inner ear.

Authors:  R Lehner; H Brugger; M M Maassen; H P Zenner
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.697

6.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Sigfrid D Soli; Marco Carner; L Colletti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Technical note on microcatheter implantation for local inner ear drug delivery: surgical technique and safety aspects.

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke; Rainer Zimmermann; Hans-Peter Zenner; Hubert Löwenheim
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Comparison of the implantability of electronic hearing devices in a virtual reality planning environment and in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Marcus M Maassen; Erwin Schwaderer; Bernd Heinrich; Stephan Herberhold; Paul S Mauz; Florian Dammann
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 9.  Inner ear drug delivery for auditory applications.

Authors:  Erin E Leary Swan; Mark J Mescher; William F Sewell; Sarah L Tao; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  New implantable hearing device based on a micro-actuator that is directly coupled to the inner ear fluid.

Authors:  Hans Bernhard; Christof Stieger; Yves Perriard
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006
View more
  9 in total

1.  Development of a microfluidics-based intracochlear drug delivery device.

Authors:  William F Sewell; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Zhiqiang Chen; Jason Fiering; Ophir Handzel; Maria Holmboe; Ernest S Kim; Sharon G Kujawa; Michael J McKenna; Mark M Mescher; Brian Murphy; Erin E Leary Swan; Marcello Peppi; Sarah Tao
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Assessing the accuracy of tympanometric evaluation of external auditory canal volume: a scientific study using an ear canal model.

Authors:  A Al-Hussaini; D Owens; A Tomkinson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Microsystems technologies for drug delivery to the inner ear.

Authors:  Erin E Leary Pararas; David A Borkholder; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Intracochlear drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Microfabricated reciprocating micropump for intracochlear drug delivery with integrated drug/fluid storage and electronically controlled dosing.

Authors:  Vishal Tandon; Woo Seok Kang; Tremaan A Robbins; Abigail J Spencer; Ernest S Kim; Michael J McKenna; Sharon G Kujawa; Jason Fiering; Erin E L Pararas; Mark J Mescher; William F Sewell; Jeffrey T Borenstein
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  A microfluidic reciprocating intracochlear drug delivery system with reservoir and active dose control.

Authors:  Ernest S Kim; Erich Gustenhoven; Mark J Mescher; Erin E Leary Pararas; Kim A Smith; Abigail J Spencer; Vishal Tandon; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Jason Fiering
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Reconstruction and exploration of virtual middle-ear models derived from micro-CT datasets.

Authors:  Dong H Lee; Sonny Chan; Curt Salisbury; Namkeun Kim; Kenneth Salisbury; Sunil Puria; Nikolas H Blevins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A Bone-Thickness Map as a Guide for Bone-Anchored Port Implantation Surgery in the Temporal Bone.

Authors:  Jérémie Guignard; Andreas Arnold; Christian Weisstanner; Marco Caversaccio; Christof Stieger
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Pediatric morphometric study to guide the optimized implantation of the Osia® 2 implant system.

Authors:  Balint Posta; Adam Perenyi; Linda Szabo; Roland Nagy; Gabor Katona; Zsuzsanna Csakanyi; Laszlo Rovo; Zsofia Bere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.236

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.