Literature DB >> 1937075

Motion perception in the peripheral visual field.

M Fahle1, C Wehrhahn.   

Abstract

Thresholds were determined for the perception of the motion of a single bar moving at different positions in the field of view. Performance in the temporal hemified was slightly superior to that in the nasal hemifield and depended on the orientation as well as on the direction of the motion. The perception of horizontal motion was better than that of vertical motion. In spite of large variations, centrifugal motion was significantly more readily perceived than centripetal motion.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1937075     DOI: 10.1007/bf00166305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  40 in total

1.  Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus.

Authors:  G WESTHEIMER
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1954-12

2.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina.

Authors:  H Wässle; U Grünert; J Röhrenbeck; B B Boycott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex.

Authors:  M Fahle; M Schmid
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  S P McKee; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; A P Aitsebaomo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Apparent foveofugal drift of counterphase gratings.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; M G Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.

Authors:  S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Is a one eyed racing driver safe to compete? Formula one (eye) or two?

Authors:  W Westlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Motion anisotropies and heading detection.

Authors:  M Lappe; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.