BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumours are tumours of cells, which possess secretory granules and originate from the neuroectoderm. While liver resection is generally advocated in patients with resectable liver metastases, recent studies have shown good survival in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours who underwent thermal ablation using radiofrequency. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and LILACS until July 2008 for identifying the randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing liver resection (alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) versus other interventions (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, or immunotherapy) and those comparing liver resection and thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) in patients with resectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours for the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion. MAIN RESULTS: We were unable to identify any randomised clinical trial suitable for inclusion in this review. We were also unable to identify any quasi-randomised studies, cohort studies, or case-control studies that could inform meaningfully. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Liver resection appears to be the main stay curative treatment for neuroendocrine liver metastases based on non-randomised studies. Further randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection alone or in combination with chemoembolisation or radionuclide therapy are needed. Further randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation in selected patients may also be appropriate.
BACKGROUND:Neuroendocrine tumours are tumours of cells, which possess secretory granules and originate from the neuroectoderm. While liver resection is generally advocated in patients with resectable liver metastases, recent studies have shown good survival in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours who underwent thermal ablation using radiofrequency. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and LILACS until July 2008 for identifying the randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing liver resection (alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) versus other interventions (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, or immunotherapy) and those comparing liver resection and thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) in patients with resectable liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours for the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently identified trials for inclusion. MAIN RESULTS: We were unable to identify any randomised clinical trial suitable for inclusion in this review. We were also unable to identify any quasi-randomised studies, cohort studies, or case-control studies that could inform meaningfully. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection versus other treatments in patients with resectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Liver resection appears to be the main stay curative treatment for neuroendocrine liver metastases based on non-randomised studies. Further randomised clinical trials comparing liver resection alone or in combination with chemoembolisation or radionuclide therapy are needed. Further randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation in selected patients may also be appropriate.
Authors: Sanjay Gupta; Marcella M Johnson; Ravi Murthy; Kamran Ahrar; Michael J Wallace; David C Madoff; Stephen E McRae; Marshall E Hicks; Sujaya Rao; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jaffer A Ajani; James C Yao Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Rubin; J Ajani; W Schirmer; A P Venook; R Bukowski; R Pommier; L Saltz; P Dandona; L Anthony Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Wängberg; G Westberg; U Tylén; L Tisell; S Jansson; O Nilsson; V Johansson; T Scherstén; H Ahlman Journal: World J Surg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Xu-Feng Zhang; Eliza W Beal; Jeffery Chakedis; Yi Lv; Fabio Bagante; Luca Aldrighetti; George A Poultsides; Todd W Bauer; Ryan C Fields; Shishir Kumar Maithel; Hugo P Marques; Matthew Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: F M Watzka; C Fottner; M Miederer; A Schad; M M Weber; G Otto; H Lang; T J Musholt Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Moritz Schmelzle; Claus F Eisenberger; Jan Schulte am Esch; Hanno Matthaei; Markus Krausch; Wolfram T Knoefel Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Ravi Marudanayagam; Bynvant Sandhu; M Thamara P R Perera; Phillipe Taniere; Chris Coldham; Simon Bramhall; David Mayer; John Buckels; Darius Mirza Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.647