Literature DB >> 19368221

Escherichia coli O157:H7 requires colonizing partner to adhere and persist in a capillary flow cell.

Benjamin J Klayman1, Paul A Volden, Philip S Stewart, Anne K Camper.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The ability of a strain of waterborne Escherichia coli O157:H7 to colonize a glass flow cell and develop microcolonies when grown alone and with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was examined. When introduced alone, planktonic E. coil were unable to attach to the glass surface. When introduced simultaneously with P. aeruginosa (co-inoculation), the two species coadhered to the surface. When E. coliwere introduced into a flow cell precolonized with a P. aeruginosa biofilm (precolonized), 10-fold more cells were retained than in the co-inoculated case. Both species were monitored nondestructively by time-lapse confocal microscopy, direct microscopy of the filtered effluent, and effluent plate counts. While more E. coli initially adhered in the precolonized system, E. coli microcolony formation occurred only in the co-inoculated system, where E. coil comprised 1% of the total surface-associated biovolume but greater than 50% of the biovolume near the edges of the flow cell. The hydrodynamics in the flow cell were evaluated using the finite volume analysis program CFX, revealing that shear stress was likely important in both initial attachment and steady-state colonization patterns. This research elucidates key factors which promote retention and subsequent biofilm development of E. coli 0157:H7.
INTRODUCTION: Bacteria exist in nature primarily in communities known as biofilms. These biofilms are usually characterized by differentiated structures, exhibit a different phenotype than their planktonic counterparts, and in nature most often consist of multispecies consortia (1, 2). An important process in shaping the formation and structure of some multispecies biofilms is the ability of certain species to coaggregate. In this process, planktonic cells adhere to genetically distinct cells in a biofilm or to other planktonic cells (3), thereby increasing biofilm formation. This process is growth-phase-dependent and is turned on and off by cells, suggestive that it may also play a role in dispersal and dissemination (4). Due to these and other complexities of the biofilm mode of growth, multiple species can coexist despite one organism having a much higher growth rate than another (5-7). In many cases, bacteria have been shown to gain a fitness advantage when residing in a mixed-species versus single-

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19368221     DOI: 10.1021/es802218q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  Local interactions and self-organized spatial patterns stabilize microbial cross-feeding against cheaters.

Authors:  Simon Maccracken Stump; Evan Curtis Johnson; Christopher A Klausmeier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Hand-pumps as reservoirs for microbial contamination of well water.

Authors:  Andrew S Ferguson; Brian J Mailloux; Kazi M Ahmed; Alexander van Geen; Larry D McKay; Patricia J Culligan
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation.

Authors:  Dawei Ren; Jonas S Madsen; Søren J Sørensen; Mette Burmølle
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Intra- and inter-species interactions within biofilms of important foodborne bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Even Heir; Mickaël Desvaux; Michel Hébraud; Trond Møretrø; Solveig Langsrud; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas; Miroslava Kačániová; Katarzyna Czaczyk; Hülya Ölmez; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Abundance and Distribution of Enteric Bacteria and Viruses in Coastal and Estuarine Sediments-a Review.

Authors:  Francis Hassard; Ceri L Gwyther; Kata Farkas; Anthony Andrews; Vera Jones; Brian Cox; Howard Brett; Davey L Jones; James E McDonald; Shelagh K Malham
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Synergistic Interactions in Microbial Biofilms Facilitate the Establishment of Opportunistic Pathogenic Fungi in Household Dishwashers.

Authors:  Jerneja Zupančič; Prem K Raghupathi; Kurt Houf; Mette Burmølle; Søren J Sørensen; Nina Gunde-Cimerman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  A meta-proteomics approach to study the interspecies interactions affecting microbial biofilm development in a model community.

Authors:  Jakob Herschend; Zacharias B V Damholt; Andrea M Marquard; Birte Svensson; Søren J Sørensen; Per Hägglund; Mette Burmølle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Functional metagenomics of Escherichia coli O157:H7 interactions with spinach indigenous microorganisms during biofilm formation.

Authors:  Michelle Q Carter; Kai Xue; Maria T Brandl; Feifei Liu; Liyou Wu; Jacqueline W Louie; Robert E Mandrell; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Co-culture with Listeria monocytogenes within a dual-species biofilm community strongly increases resistance of Pseudomonas putida to benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Nikos Chorianopoulos; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Life on the outside: role of biofilms in environmental persistence of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Philippe Vogeleer; Yannick D N Tremblay; Akier A Mafu; Mario Jacques; Josée Harel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.