Literature DB >> 19367465

Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status.

A Giovagnoni1, L Bartolucci, A Manna, J Morbiducci, G Ascoli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper analyses the methodological and technical aspects of health technology assessment (HTA) as a tool for evaluating health technologies and procedures, with special reference to diagnostic imaging; describes the main experiences with HTA at the international and national level; outlines the most important HTA projects in Italy, and analyses the effects of HTA on health care strategies and policies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The work was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the authors analysed the principles, methods and instruments of HTA; in the second, they evaluated the current status of HTA in different countries; and in the third, they defined the impact of HTA on the decision-making process in health care.
RESULTS: Since the 1970s, technological innovation has been accompanied by the development of methods for the multidisciplinary assessment of the technical, scientific, economic, ethical and social aspects inherent in the use of new technologies. The method is implemented at an international level by a network of public and private bodies that carry out HTA in support of health care policies.
CONCLUSIONS: Because the application of HTA is still in its early stages in Italy, it is necessary to promote its development by drawing on consolidated international experiences.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19367465     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-00387-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  9 in total

1.  Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.

Authors:  M G Myriam Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence-based radiology.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs.

Authors:  L S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Medicine, practice and guidelines: the uneasy juncture of science and art.

Authors:  R N Battista; M J Hodge; P Vineis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Technology assessment in diagnostic imaging. A proposal for a phased approach to evaluating radiology research.

Authors:  C R Taylor; J G Elmore; K Sun; S K Inouye
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D L Kent; E B Larson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it.

Authors:  J R Thornbury
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; P X Tugwell; D H Feeny; R B Haynes; M Drummond
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic outcome of routine clinical noninvasive multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L La Grutta; G Runza; G Gentile; E Russo; G Lo Re; M Galia; T V Bartolotta; V Alaimo; R Malagò; F Cademartiri; A E Cardinale; M Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Acceptance of noninvasive computed tomography coronary angiography: for a patient-friendly medicine.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Sabina La Grutta; Massimo Galia; Giuseppe Lo Piccolo; Giovanni Gentile; Giuseppe La Tona; Maria Stella Epifanio; Erica Maffei; Filippo Cademartiri; Rosa Lo Baido; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada.

Authors:  Michèle Tony; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Donna Rindress; Tina Papastavros; Paul Oh; Mireille M Goetghebeur
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Sally Green; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.