Literature DB >> 19366799

Global histone modifications in breast cancer correlate with tumor phenotypes, prognostic factors, and patient outcome.

Somaia E Elsheikh1, Andrew R Green, Emad A Rakha, Des G Powe, Rabab A Ahmed, Hilary M Collins, Daniele Soria, Jonathan M Garibaldi, Claire E Paish, Amr A Ammar, Matthew J Grainge, Graham R Ball, Magdy K Abdelghany, Luisa Martinez-Pomares, David M Heery, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

Post-translational histone modifications are known to be altered in cancer cells, and loss of selected histone acetylation and methylation marks has recently been shown to predict patient outcome in human carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect a series of histone lysine acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K18ac, H4K12ac, and H4K16ac), lysine methylation (H3K4me2 and H4K20me3), and arginine methylation (H4R3me2) marks in a well-characterized series of human breast carcinomas (n = 880). Tissue staining intensities were assessed using blinded semiquantitative scoring. Validation studies were done using immunofluorescence staining and Western blotting. Our analyses revealed low or absent H4K16ac in the majority of breast cancer cases (78.9%), suggesting that this alteration may represent an early sign of breast cancer. There was a highly significant correlation between histone modifications status, tumor biomarker phenotype, and clinical outcome, where high relative levels of global histone acetylation and methylation were associated with a favorable prognosis and detected almost exclusively in luminal-like breast tumors (93%). Moderate to low levels of lysine acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K18ac, and H4K12ac), lysine (H3K4me2 and H4K20me3), and arginine methylation (H4R3me2) were observed in carcinomas of poorer prognostic subtypes, including basal carcinomas and HER-2-positive tumors. Clustering analysis identified three groups of histone displaying distinct pattern in breast cancer, which have distinct relationships to known prognostic factors and clinical outcome. This study identifies the presence of variations in global levels of histone marks in different grades, morphologic types, and phenotype classes of invasive breast cancer and shows that these differences have clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19366799     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  156 in total

1.  The HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (panobinostat) is an inhibitory modulator of aromatase gene expression.

Authors:  Shiuan Chen; Jingjing Ye; Ikuko Kijima; Dean Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The significance, development and progress of high-throughput combinatorial histone code analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas L Young; Peter A Dimaggio; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Global histone post-translational modifications and cancer: Biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment?

Authors:  Shafqat Ali Khan; Divya Reddy; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 4.  p53-Independent, normal stem cell sparing epigenetic differentiation therapy for myeloid and other malignancies.

Authors:  Yogen Saunthararajah; Pierre Triozzi; Brian Rini; Arun Singh; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Mikkael Sekeres; Anjali Advani; Ramon Tiu; Frederic Reu; Matt Kalaycio; Ed Copelan; Eric Hsi; Alan Lichtin; Brian Bolwell
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Metabolic control of epigenetics in cancer.

Authors:  Adam Kinnaird; Steven Zhao; Kathryn E Wellen; Evangelos D Michelakis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Plant natural modulators in breast cancer prevention: status quo and future perspectives reinforced by predictive, preventive, and personalized medical approach.

Authors:  Sona Uramova; Peter Kubatka; Zuzana Dankova; Andrea Kapinova; Barbora Zolakova; Marek Samec; Pavol Zubor; Anthony Zulli; Vanda Valentova; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Peter Solar; Martin Kello; Karol Kajo; Dietrich Busselberg; Martin Pec; Jan Danko
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 7.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of histone modifications.

Authors:  He Huang; Shu Lin; Benjamin A Garcia; Yingming Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer Is Regulated by the EZH2-ERα-GREB1 Transcriptional Axis.

Authors:  Zhao Zhang; Mauro E Cenciarini; Cecilia J Proietti; Yanming Wu; Matias Amasino; Tao Hong; Mei Yang; Yiji Liao; Huai-Chin Chiang; Virginia G Kaklamani; Rinath Jeselsohn; Ratna K Vadlamudi; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Rong Li; Carmine De Angelis; Xiaoyong Fu; Patricia V Elizalde; Rachel Schiff; Myles Brown; Kexin Xu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Epigenetic Therapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maryam B Lustberg; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2011-03

10.  The histone chaperone HJURP is a new independent prognostic marker for luminal A breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Rocío Montes de Oca; Zachary A Gurard-Levin; Frédérique Berger; Haniya Rehman; Elise Martel; Armelle Corpet; Leanne de Koning; Isabelle Vassias; Laurence O W Wilson; Didier Meseure; Fabien Reyal; Alexia Savignoni; Bernard Asselain; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.