OBJECTIVE: Maintenance therapy with anti-CD25 antibody has emerged as a potentially useful treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Constitutive CD25 expression on CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg) suggests that anti-CD25 antibody treatment may potentially target a subset of T cells that exhibit immune suppressive properties. We examined changes to CD4+CD25+ Treg in patients with MS receiving maintenance anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody treatment to determine the effect of treatment on Treg and, consequently, on immunological tolerance. DESIGN: Peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples obtained from a before-and-after trial of anti-CD25 antibody monotherapy were examined to compare baseline and treatment differences in CD4+CD25+ Treg. SUBJECTS: A total of 15 subjects with MS. One subject was withdrawn owing to an adverse effect. RESULTS: Sustained reduction of the frequency of CD4+CD25+ Treg was observed during treatment. Anti-CD25 antibody treatment led to evidence of impaired in vivo Treg proliferation and impaired ex vivo Treg suppression. Inflammatory MS activity was substantially reduced with treatment despite reduction of circulating Treg, and there was no correlation between changes in the frequency of Treg and changes in brain inflammatory activity. However, new-onset inflammatory disease, notably dermatitis, was also observed in a number of subjects during treatment. CONCLUSION: The reduction in Treg did not negatively affect maintenance of central nervous system tolerance during anti-CD25 antibody treatment. The incidence of new-onset inflammatory disease outside of the central nervous system in a subset of patients, however, warrants further studies to examine the possibility of compartmental differences in the capacity to maintain tolerance in the setting of reduced CD4+CD25+ Treg.
OBJECTIVE: Maintenance therapy with anti-CD25 antibody has emerged as a potentially useful treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Constitutive CD25 expression on CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg) suggests that anti-CD25 antibody treatment may potentially target a subset of T cells that exhibit immune suppressive properties. We examined changes to CD4+CD25+ Treg in patients with MS receiving maintenance anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody treatment to determine the effect of treatment on Treg and, consequently, on immunological tolerance. DESIGN: Peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples obtained from a before-and-after trial of anti-CD25 antibody monotherapy were examined to compare baseline and treatment differences in CD4+CD25+ Treg. SUBJECTS: A total of 15 subjects with MS. One subject was withdrawn owing to an adverse effect. RESULTS: Sustained reduction of the frequency of CD4+CD25+ Treg was observed during treatment. Anti-CD25 antibody treatment led to evidence of impaired in vivo Treg proliferation and impaired ex vivo Treg suppression. Inflammatory MS activity was substantially reduced with treatment despite reduction of circulating Treg, and there was no correlation between changes in the frequency of Treg and changes in brain inflammatory activity. However, new-onset inflammatory disease, notably dermatitis, was also observed in a number of subjects during treatment. CONCLUSION: The reduction in Treg did not negatively affect maintenance of central nervous system tolerance during anti-CD25 antibody treatment. The incidence of new-onset inflammatory disease outside of the central nervous system in a subset of patients, however, warrants further studies to examine the possibility of compartmental differences in the capacity to maintain tolerance in the setting of reduced CD4+CD25+ Treg.
Authors: Bibiana Bielekova; Marta Catalfamo; Susan Reichert-Scrivner; Amy Packer; Magdalena Cerna; Thomas A Waldmann; Henry McFarland; Pierre A Henkart; Roland Martin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hideaki Sugiyama; Rolland Gyulai; Eiko Toichi; Edina Garaczi; Shinji Shimada; Seth R Stevens; Thomas S McCormick; Kevin D Cooper Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jürgen Haas; Andreas Hug; Andrea Viehöver; Benedikt Fritzsching; Christine S Falk; Andrea Filser; Tina Vetter; Linda Milkova; Mirjam Korporal; Brigitte Fritz; Brigitte Storch-Hagenlocher; Peter H Krammer; Elisabeth Suri-Payer; Brigitte Wildemann Journal: Eur J Immunol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jason D Fontenot; Jeffrey P Rasmussen; Luke M Williams; James L Dooley; Andrew G Farr; Alexander Y Rudensky Journal: Immunity Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: J Nourse; E Firpo; W M Flanagan; S Coats; K Polyak; M H Lee; J Massague; G R Crabtree; J M Roberts Journal: Nature Date: 1994-12-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nabila Seddiki; Brigitte Santner-Nanan; Jeff Martinson; John Zaunders; Sarah Sasson; Alan Landay; Michael Solomon; Warwick Selby; Stephen I Alexander; Ralph Nanan; Anthony Kelleher; Barbara Fazekas de St Groth Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Weihong Liu; Amy L Putnam; Zhou Xu-Yu; Gregory L Szot; Michael R Lee; Shirley Zhu; Peter A Gottlieb; Philipp Kapranov; Thomas R Gingeras; Barbara Fazekas de St Groth; Carol Clayberger; David M Soper; Steven F Ziegler; Jeffrey A Bluestone Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Daniel R Getts; Sushma Shankar; Emily M L Chastain; Aaron Martin; Meghann Teague Getts; Kathryn Wood; Stephen D Miller Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.196