Literature DB >> 19364512

Short-term memory for pictures seen once or twice.

Paolo Martini1, Vera Maljkovic.   

Abstract

The present study is concerned with the effects of exposure time, repetition, spacing and lag on old/new recognition memory for generic visual scenes presented in a RSVP paradigm. Early memory studies with verbal material found that knowledge of total exposure time at study is sufficient to accurately predict memory performance at test (the Total Time Hypothesis), irrespective of number of repetitions, spacing or lag. However, other studies have disputed such simple dependence of memory strength on total study time, demonstrating super-additive facilitatory effects of spacing and lag, as well as inhibitory effects, such as the Ranschburg effect, Repetition Blindness and the Attentional Blink. In the experimental conditions of the present study we find no evidence of either facilitatory or inhibitory effects: recognition memory for pictures in RSVP supports the Total Time Hypothesis. The data are consistent with an Unequal-Variance Signal Detection Theory model of memory that assumes the average strength and the variance of the familiarity of pictures both increase with total study time. The main conclusion is that the growth of visual scene familiarity with temporal exposure and repetition is a stochastically independent process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364512      PMCID: PMC2691477          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures.

Authors:  Koen Lamberts; Noellie Brockdorff; Evan Heit
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana; Marc W Howard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

3.  Limits on the memory storage capacity of bounded synapses.

Authors:  Stefano Fusi; L F Abbott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

5.  Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Inhibiting effects of recall.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03

7.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.

Authors:  V Stretch; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Universal memory mechanism for familiarity recognition and identification.

Authors:  Volodya Yakovlev; Daniel J Amit; Sandro Romani; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  Consciousness and attention: on sufficiency and necessity.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-20

2.  Briefly Flashed Scenes Can Be Stored in Long-Term Memory.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Marlène Poncet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Early Visual Processing and Perception Processes in Object Discrimination Learning.

Authors:  Matías Quiñones; David Gómez; Rodrigo Montefusco-Siegmund; María de la Luz Aylwin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.