Literature DB >> 19363687

Influencing factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer.

Zhi-jie Cong1, Chuan-gang Fu, Han-tao Wang, Lian-jie Liu, Wei Zhang, Hao Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyze the factors associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS: Retrospectively collected consecutive data of 738 rectal cancer patients who underwent anterior resection in our hospital between 2005 and 2008 were reviewed. The associations between 15 patient-related and surgery-related variables and anastomotic leakage were studied with both the univariate chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage were low rectal cancer (located 5 cm or less above the dentate line) (5.9% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.003), non-specialized surgeon (3.9% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.031), and defunctioning transanal catheter placement (14.5% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.001). It should be noted that the mean surgeon case volumes of anterior resection of colorectal surgeons and non-specialized general surgeons were 43 per year and 2 per year, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, there was a tendency for colorectal surgeons to operate on a greater proportion of low rectal cancers (72.1% vs. 52.8%; P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, besides low rectal cancer, non-specialized surgeon, and transanal catheter placement, three other factors were associated with anastomotic leakage: diabetes mellitus (P = 0.027), free distal margins less than 1 cm (P = 0.009), and a defunctioning stoma (P = 0.031). In a further analysis of 522 patients with low rectal cancer, the leakage rate in patients with a defunctioning stoma was significantly lower (2.9% vs. 8.5%; P = 0.007). By contrast, the leakage rate in the transanal catheter placement group was higher (15.1% vs. 4.9%; P = 0.008), because of its poor protective effect as well as the selection bias.
CONCLUSIONS: From the findings of this study, we believe that low rectal cancer, non-specialized surgeons, and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery, and that a defunctioning stoma could significantly reduce the incidence of leakage in low rectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363687     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer following the introduction of a colorectal unit.

Authors:  K Smedh; L Olsson; H Johansson; C Aberg; M Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  [The dehiscence of colorectal anastomoses: the risk factors].

Authors:  M Testini; A Margari; M Amoruso; G Lissidini; G M Bonomo
Journal:  Ann Ital Chir       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.766

4.  Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Nesbakken; K Nygaard; O C Lunde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Colorectal cancer: is the surgeon a prognostic factor? A systematic review.

Authors:  A P Meagher
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-09-20       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D Hole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-22

7.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy.

Authors:  Mikael Machado; Olof Hallböök; Sven Goldman; Per-Olof Nyström; Johannes Järhult; Rune Sjödahl
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Rectal cancer: the surgical options.

Authors:  R J Heald
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Frank Marusch; Andreas Koch; Uwe Schmidt; Sven Geibetaler; Henning Dralle; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Stefanie Wolff; Gerd Nestler; Matthias Pross; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis and endoluminal tubes].

Authors:  C Justinger; M K Schilling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa; Yusuke Nishizawa; Akihiro Kobayashi; Masanori Sugito; Norio Saito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pilot study of bipolar radiofrequency-induced anastomotic thermofusion-exploration of therapy parameters ex vivo.

Authors:  Hanno Winter; Christoph Holmer; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Gerd Lindner; Roland Lauster; Marc Kraft; Jörg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Circular anastomotic experimental fibrin sealant protection in deep colorectal anastomosis in pigs in a randomized 9-day survival study.

Authors:  F A Wenger; E Szucsik; B F Hoinoiu; A M Cimpean; M Ionac; M Raica
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermofusion of intestinal anastomoses--feasibility of a new anastomosis technique in porcine and rat colon.

Authors:  Christoph Holmer; Hanno Winter; Matthias Kröger; Alexandra Nagel; Annika Jaenicke; Roland Lauster; Marc Kraft; Heinz J Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  A meta-analysis of the use of a transanal drainage tube to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection by double-stapling technique for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kohei Shigeta; Koji Okabayashi; Hideo Baba; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masashi Tsuruta; Kazuo Yamafuji; Kiyoshi Kubochi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Choi; Jae Kwan Hwang; Yong Tak Ko; Han Jeong Jang; Hyeon Keun Shin; Young Chan Lee; Cheong Ho Lim; Seung Kyu Jeong; Hyung Kyu Yang
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.