Mark P Doescher1, J Elizabeth Jackson. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. mdoesche@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess rural-urban differences in mammography and Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening. METHODS: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (1994-2000, 2002, 2004) were used to examine trends in these two tests by rural-urban residence location. RESULTS: In 2004, 70.8 percent of rural and 75.7 percent of urban respondents had received timely mammography; this difference remained significant in adjusted analyses and was greatest for women in remote rural locations. Although overall participation in mammography increased over time, a persistent rural-urban gap was identified. In contrast, in 2004, while 83.1 percent of rural and 86.1 percent of urban respondents had received a timely Pap test, the adjusted difference was not significant and Pap testing did not improve over time. Advanced age and low socioeconomic status were associated with a lack of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Over an 11-year interval, mammography screening improved nationally, but women living in rural locations remained less likely than their urban counterparts to receive this test. However, no secular improvement in Pap testing was found, and no significant rural-urban differences were observed. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Interventions to improve breast cancer screening are needed for rural women. Such efforts should target older women and those with low socioeconomic status.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess rural-urban differences in mammography and Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening. METHODS: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (1994-2000, 2002, 2004) were used to examine trends in these two tests by rural-urban residence location. RESULTS: In 2004, 70.8 percent of rural and 75.7 percent of urban respondents had received timely mammography; this difference remained significant in adjusted analyses and was greatest for women in remote rural locations. Although overall participation in mammography increased over time, a persistent rural-urban gap was identified. In contrast, in 2004, while 83.1 percent of rural and 86.1 percent of urban respondents had received a timely Pap test, the adjusted difference was not significant and Pap testing did not improve over time. Advanced age and low socioeconomic status were associated with a lack of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Over an 11-year interval, mammography screening improved nationally, but women living in rural locations remained less likely than their urban counterparts to receive this test. However, no secular improvement in Pap testing was found, and no significant rural-urban differences were observed. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Interventions to improve breast cancer screening are needed for rural women. Such efforts should target older women and those with low socioeconomic status.
Authors: Lucy A Peipins; Jacqueline Miller; Thomas B Richards; Janet Kay Bobo; Ta Liu; Mary C White; Djenaba Joseph; Florence Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme Journal: J Community Health Date: 2012-12
Authors: Joseph L Riley; Elizabeth A Pomery; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Jennifer L Moss; Siddhartha Roy; Chan Shen; Joie D Cooper; Robert P Lennon; Eugene J Lengerich; Alan Adelman; William Curry; Mack T Ruffin Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Stephanie Foster; Barry Flanagan; Andrew Dent Journal: J Community Health Date: 2011-08
Authors: Julie C Weitlauf; Surai Jones; Xiangyan Xu; John W Finney; Rudolf H Moos; George F Sawaya; Susan M Frayne Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2013 May-Jun
Authors: Ashley Meilleur; S V Subramanian; Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth B Lamont Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Laura J Fish; Patricia G Moorman; Lashawn Wordlaw-Stintson; Adriana Vidal; Jennifer S Smith; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: Am J Health Educ Date: 2013