Literature DB >> 1936328

Prevention of premature luteinizing hormone and progesterone rise with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, Nal-Glu, in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

R Frydman1, C Cornel, D de Ziegler, J Taieb, I M Spitz, P Bouchard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a preliminary study on the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (Nal-Glu) for preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P) rise in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using clomiphene citrate (CC) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG).
DESIGN: Participants in the study formed two groups. Both groups received CC-hMG and Nal-Glu. Group II differs from group I for receiving human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and blood samples for 10 days after the second Nal-Glu injection.
SETTING: Centre de Fecondation in Vitro, Hôpital Antoine Béclère. PATIENTS: Eleven women 25 to 34 years of age and having normal menstrual cycles using barrier method of contraception not attempting pregnancies participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Daily blood samples, pelvic ultrasound, and CC-hMG/Nal-Glu/hCG administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Spontaneous LH surge and P rise, follicular growth, and plasma E2 levels in cycles with CC-hMG/Nal-Glu administration and (2) luteal phase after hCG injection in subjects previously treated with CC-hMG/Nal-Glu.
RESULTS: Plasma E2 level increased from 983 +/- 80 pg/mL (mean +/- SEM) on the day of the first Nal-Glu administration to 1,159 +/- 102 and 1,610 +/- 114 pg/mL (mean +/- SEM) 24 and 48 hours later. In 10 women, LH and P remained low for at least 96 hours after the first Nal-Glu administration. In one subject, plasma LH was already elevated at the time of the first Nal-Glu injection. In women who received hCG, plasma E2 and P reached a maximum of 1,258 +/- 313 pg/mL and 50.3 +/- 12.8 ng/mL (mean +/- SEM), respectively, on the 6th day of the luteal phase.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that timely Nal-Glu injections can prevent LH and P rise for at least 96 hours, in spite of increasing levels of plasma E2. Moreover, Nal-Glu had no adverse effect on the kinetic of E2 rise, the follicular growth, or on the post-hCG hormonal profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936328     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54666-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Does premature luteinization or early surge of LH impair cycle outcome? Report of two successful outcomes.

Authors:  Murat Sönmezer; Aylin Pelin Cil; Cem Atabekoğlu; Sinan Ozkavukçu; Batuhan Ozmen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive techniques: are there clinical differences between agents?

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Ricardo E Felberbaum; Askan Schultze-Mosgau; Klaus Diedrich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Individualised controlled ovarian stimulation (iCOS): maximising success rates for assisted reproductive technology patients.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  The effectiveness of earlier oocyte retrieval in the case of a premature luteinizing hormone surge on hCG day in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Min Hye Choi; Sun Hwa Cha; Chan Woo Park; Jin Young Kim; Kwang Moon Yang; In Ok Song; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang; Hye Ok Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2013-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.