Literature DB >> 19362125

Vestibular and proprioceptive influences on trunk movements during quiet standing.

C G C Horlings1, U M Küng, F Honegger, B G M Van Engelen, N Van Alfen, B R Bloem, J H J Allum.   

Abstract

We characterized upper trunk and pelvis motion in normal subjects and in subjects with vestibular or proprioceptive loss, to document upper body movement modes in the pitch and roll planes during quiet stance. Six bilateral vestibular loss (VL), six bilateral lower-leg proprioceptive loss (PL) and 28 healthy subjects performed four stance tasks: standing on firm or foam surface with eyes open or closed. Motion of the upper body was measured using two pairs of body-worn gyroscopes, one mounted at the pelvis and the other pair at the shoulders. Pitch and roll angular velocities recorded from the gyroscopes were analyzed separately for low-frequency (<0.7 Hz) and high-frequency (>3 Hz) motion. Low-frequency pitch motion was similar for all groups, consisting of in-phase pelvis and shoulder motion. High-frequency pitch motion in controls and VL subjects was dominated by pelvis motion with little shoulder motion, but vice versa in PL subjects. Low-frequency roll motion changed for all groups from mainly shoulder and little pelvis motion to in-phase pelvis and shoulder motion after moving from a firm to foam surface. In contrast, high-frequency roll motion changed from mainly shoulder motion to mainly pelvis motion with the change to a foam surface, except for PL subjects with eyes closed. Coherent low-frequency sway between pelvis and shoulder was only pronounced in VL patients. These results indicate that relative motion between the pelvis and shoulder depends on the support surface, the type of sensory loss, and whether the motion is in roll or pitch plane. Furthermore, relative motion between the pelvis and upper trunk is an integral part of movement modes used to control quiet stance. Vestibular loss patients showed very similar movement modes as controls, with larger amplitudes. Proprioceptive loss patients, however, used more shoulder motion and stabilized the pelvis for the high-frequency mode. We conclude that there is relative motion between the upper trunk and pelvis during quiet stance and suggest that it may contribute to balance control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362125     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  12 in total

1.  Influence of stance width on frontal plane postural dynamics and coordination in human balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Altered visual and somatosensory feedback affects gait stability in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jordan J Craig; Adam P Bruetsch; Sharon G Lynch; Jessie M Huisinga
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Strategies used by individuals with multiple sclerosis and with mild disability to maintain dynamic stability during a steering task.

Authors:  Luke T Denommé; Patricia Mandalfino; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Trunk sway in mildly disabled multiple sclerosis patients with and without balance impairment.

Authors:  Oliver Findling; Johann Sellner; Niklaus Meier; John H J Allum; Dominique Vibert; Carmen Lienert; Heinrich P Mattle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interaction between vestibulo-spinal and corticospinal systems: a combined caloric and transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  J Guzman-Lopez; Y Buisson; P H Strutton; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control.

Authors:  Tjitske Anke Boonstra; Alfred C Schouten; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Recovery of vestibular ocular reflex function and balance control after a unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit.

Authors:  J H J Allum
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  The effect of prosthetic feedback on the strategies and synergies used by vestibular loss subjects to control stance.

Authors:  Flurin Honegger; Imke M A Hillebrandt; Nadja G A van den Elzen; Kok-Sing Tang; John H J Allum
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The filtering of the posturographic signals shows the age related features.

Authors:  Krzysztof Piotr Michalak; Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk; Paweł Nawrot; Piotr Woźniak; Peter Vieregge
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.