Literature DB >> 31150900

Altered visual and somatosensory feedback affects gait stability in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Jordan J Craig1, Adam P Bruetsch2, Sharon G Lynch3, Jessie M Huisinga4.   

Abstract

Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) often report problems due to sensory loss and have an inability to appropriately reweight sensory information. Both of these issues can affect individual's ability to maintain stability when walking under challenging conditions. The purpose of the current study was to determine how gait stability is adapted when walking under challenging sensory conditions where vision and somatosensation at the feet is manipulated. 25 healthy adults and 40 PwMS (15 fallers, 25 non-fallers) walked on a treadmill at their preferred normal walking speed under 3 conditions: normal walking, altered vision using goggles that shifted visual field laterally, and altered somatosensation using shoes with compliant foam soles. Inertial measurement united recorded acceleration at the lumbar and right ankle, and acceleration variability measures were calculated including root mean square (RMS), range, sample entropy (SaEn), and Lyapunov exponents (LyE). A gait stability index (GSI) was calculated using each of the four variability measures as the ratio of lumbar acceleration variability divided by foot acceleration variability in the frontal and sagittal planes. The sagittal and frontal GSIRMS were larger in the somatosensory condition compared to the normal and visual conditions (p < 0.001). The frontal GSISaEn was greater in the visual condition compared to the somatosensory condition (p = 0.021). The frontal and sagittal GSILyE was greater in the somatosensory condition compared to the normal and visual conditions (p < 0.002). The current study showed that HC, MS non-fallers and MS fallers largely adapted to altered sensory feedback during walking in a similar manner. However, MS faller subjects may be more reliant on visual feedback compared to MS non-fallers and HC subjects.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Multiple sclerosis; Sensory; Vision

Year:  2019        PMID: 31150900      PMCID: PMC7309345          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  53 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis.

Authors:  Elliot M Frohman; Michael K Racke; Cedric S Raine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Role of visual input in the control of dynamic balance: variability and instability of gait in treadmill walking while blindfolded.

Authors:  Fabienne Reynard; Philippe Terrier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Accelerometry reveals differences in gait variability between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls.

Authors:  Jessie M Huisinga; Martina Mancini; Rebecca J St George; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The Romberg ratio in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alon Kalron
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley; S F Ginter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Advanced age brings a greater reliance on visual feedback to maintain balance during walking.

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Carrie A Francis; Matthew S Allen; Shawn M O'Connor; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Sensory Interactions for Head and Trunk Control in Space in Young and Older Adults During Normal and Narrow-Base Walking.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Nandini Deshpande
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  Predicting accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis -- a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Y Nilsagård; Cecilia Lundholm; E Denison; L-G Gunnarsson
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

Authors:  J F Kurtzke
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing.

Authors:  Shawn M O'Connor; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mikaela L Frechette; Brett M Meyer; Lindsey J Tulipani; Reed D Gurchiek; Ryan S McGinnis; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Visual oscillation effects on dynamic balance control in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lara Riem; Scott A Beardsley; Ahmed Z Obeidat; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.208

Review 3.  Entropy Analysis in Gait Research: Methodological Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yentes; Peter C Raffalt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The effects of mechanical noise bandwidth on balance across flat and compliant surfaces.

Authors:  Jeshaiah Zhen Syuen Khor; Alpha Agape Gopalai; Boon Leong Lan; Darwin Gouwanda; Siti Anom Ahmad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Detection of Postural Control in Young and Elderly Adults Using Deep and Machine Learning Methods with Joint-Node Plots.

Authors:  Posen Lee; Tai-Been Chen; Chi-Yuan Wang; Shih-Yen Hsu; Chin-Hsuan Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Efficacy of Virtual Reality and Exergaming in Improving Balance in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dario Calafiore; Marco Invernizzi; Antonio Ammendolia; Nicola Marotta; Francesco Fortunato; Teresa Paolucci; Francesco Ferraro; Claudio Curci; Agnieszka Cwirlej-Sozanska; Alessandro de Sire
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.