Literature DB >> 19361993

Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate.

Frédéric Mery1, Susana A M Varela, Etienne Danchin, Simon Blanchet, Deseada Parejo, Isabelle Coolen, Richard H Wagner.   

Abstract

Organisms require information to make decisions about fitness-affecting resources, such as mates. Animals may extract "personal information" about potential mates by observing their physical characteristics or extract additional "public information" by observing their mating performance [1]. Mate copying by females [2-6] is a form of public information use that may reduce uncertainty about male quality, allowing more adaptive choices [2]. Experimental studies have produced evidence that female mate copying occurs in several species of fish [3], birds [5-7], and mammals [8], including humans [9]. We report the first evidence that a female invertebrate can exploit public information to select mates. In a first experiment, Drosophila melanogaster female prospectors increased their time in the attraction zones of poor-condition males, but not of good-condition males, after having observed them with a model female. This suggests that females appraised prospective mates by exploiting public information and did so mainly when it contrasted with personal information. In a second experiment, prospector females preferably mated with males of the color type they had previously observed copulating over males of the rejected color type, suggesting that female Drosophila can generalize socially learned information. The complexity of Drosophila decision-making suggests an unprecedented level of cognition in invertebrates. Our findings have implications for evolution given that socially learned mate preferences may lead to reproductive isolation, setting the stage for speciation [10].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19361993     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  52 in total

Review 1.  Social eavesdropping and the evolution of conditional cooperation and cheating strategies.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Costs of memory: lessons from 'mini' brains.

Authors:  James G Burns; Julien Foucaud; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Do invertebrates have culture?

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Simon Blanchet; Frédérick Mery; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-07

4.  Attraction to and learning from social cues in fruitfly larvae.

Authors:  Zachary Durisko; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A simple assay to study social behavior in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group.

Authors:  A F Simon; M-T Chou; E D Salazar; T Nicholson; N Saini; S Metchev; D E Krantz
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  How rugged individualists enable one another to find food and shelter: field experiments with tropical hermit crabs.

Authors:  Mark E Laidre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies.

Authors:  Sachin Sarin; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution.

Authors:  Étienne Danchin; Anne Charmantier; Frances A Champagne; Alex Mesoudi; Benoit Pujol; Simon Blanchet
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence.

Authors:  Guillaume Rieucau; Luc-Alain Giraldeau
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Conspecifics as informers and competitors: an experimental study in foraging bumble-bees.

Authors:  Mathilde Baude; Étienne Danchin; Marianne Mugabo; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.