Literature DB >> 19759037

Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies.

Sachin Sarin1, Reuven Dukas.   

Abstract

Social learning, defined as learning from other individuals, has had dramatic effects on some species, including humans, in whom it has generated a rich culture. As a first step in examining the evolution of and mechanisms underlying social learning in insects, we tested for social learning in fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster). Focal females (observers) that experienced novel food together with mated females (models), who had laid eggs on that food, subsequently exhibited a stronger preference for laying eggs on that food over another novel food compared with focal females that experienced the food alone. We observed no social learning, however, when observers experienced food with potentially more ambiguous social information provided by the presence of either virgin models or aggregation pheromone. This first documentation of social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies builds on recent data indicating intricate use of social information by fruitflies and opens up exciting avenues for research on the evolution and neurogenetics of social learning using biology's major model system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19759037      PMCID: PMC2817106          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Preimaginal conditioning in Drosophila revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Pheromone-mediated aggregation in nonsocial arthropods: an evolutionary ecological perspective.

Authors:  Bregje Wertheim; Erik-Jan A van Baalen; Marcel Dicke; Louise E M Vet
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Social learning in noncolonial insects?

Authors:  Isabelle Coolen; Olivier Dangles; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Generalization of courtship learning in Drosophila is mediated by cis-vaccenyl acetate.

Authors:  Aki Ejima; Benjamin P C Smith; Christophe Lucas; Wynand van der Goes van Naters; Carson J Miller; John R Carlson; Joel D Levine; Leslie C Griffith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Effects of survival on the attractiveness of cues to natal dispersers.

Authors:  Judy Stamps; Barney Luttbeg; V V Krishnan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Discovery of genes involved with learning and memory: an experimental synthesis of Hirschian and Benzerian perspectives.

Authors:  T Tully
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Social learning in insects--from miniature brains to consensus building.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes.

Authors:  Chung-Hui Yang; Priyanka Belawat; Ernst Hafen; Lily Y Jan; Yuh-Nung Jan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Drosophila olfactory memory: single genes to complex neural circuits.

Authors:  Alex C Keene; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  35 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Samyukta Jagadeesh; Nancy Stepek; Reza Azanchi; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Attraction to and learning from social cues in fruitfly larvae.

Authors:  Zachary Durisko; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ecology of information: social transmission dynamics within groups of non-social insects.

Authors:  Marine Battesti; Cristian Pasquaretta; Celine Moreno; Serafino Teseo; Dominique Joly; Elizabeth Klensch; Odile Petit; Cedric Sueur; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Predatory cannibalism in Drosophila melanogaster larvae.

Authors:  Roshan K Vijendravarma; Sunitha Narasimha; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A Bayesian Approach to Social Structure Uncovers Cryptic Regulation of Group Dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Julia B Saltz; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Social structures depend on innate determinants and chemosensory processing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jonathan Schneider; Michael H Dickinson; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Food selection in larval fruit flies: dynamics and effects on larval development.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwarz; Zachary Durisko; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-12-19

Review 9.  Cognitive innovations and the evolutionary biology of expertise.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.

Authors:  Jacob A Jezovit; Rebecca Rooke; Jonathan Schneider; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.