Literature DB >> 19361605

Usefulness of serial monitoring of B-type natriuretic peptide for the detection of acute rejection after heart transplantation.

Iris P Garrido1, Domingo A Pascual-Figal, Francisco Nicolás, Maria J González-Carrillo, Sergio Manzano-Fernández, Jesús Sánchez-Mas, Mariano Valdés-Chavarri.   

Abstract

Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increased after heart transplantation (HT), but it has not been well established whether BNP could be used to detect acute rejection in asymptomatic patients after HT. A total of 259 routine endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 50 consecutive patients after HT (83% men; age 50 +/- 15 years) were studied. Serial BNP measurements were performed at the time of each biopsy. BNP was evaluated as an absolute level (picograms per milliliter) and percentage of change from the previous biopsy (BNP - BNP at previous biopsy)/BNP at previous biopsy] x 100). Rejection was defined as grade > or =2R International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system. BNP correlated independently with time after HT (p <0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (p <0.001), creatinine (p = 0.001), and age (p = 0.0012). Asymptomatic rejection was found in 15 biopsy specimens (6%), for which absolute BNP (106 pg/ml; interquartile range [IQR] 67 to 495) did not differ from nonrejection biopsy specimens (92 pg/ml; IQR 49 to 230; p = 0.286). BNP percentage of change showed a median of +60% (IQR -29 to +154%) in rejection versus -17% (IQR -47 to +19%) in nonrejection biopsy specimens (p = 0.009). After multivariable adjustment, BNP percentage of change was a consistent predictor of rejection (+10%; odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.09, p = 0.021). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.643 to 0.768) and identified percentage of change <+38% as an optimal cut-off point, with a negative predictive value of 97%. In conclusion, serial monitoring of BNP, evaluated as a percentage of change, may be a useful noninvasive tool in the clinical management of rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19361605     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Novel Biomarker Approaches for Managing Patients With Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Peter J Kennel; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  [Biomarker for diagnosis of rejection after heart transplantation].

Authors:  Matthias Frick; Herwig Antretter; Otmar Pachinger; Gerhard Pölzl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jun Zheng; Xu-Dong Pan; Ming-Duo Zhang; Tie-Yuan Zhu; Bin Li; Li-Zhong Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Cardiac Allograft Rejection Induces Changes in Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: RANGAP1 as a Potential Non-Invasive Biomarker.

Authors:  Silvia Lozano-Edo; Esther Roselló-Lletí; Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro; Estefanía Tarazón; Manuel Portolés; Maryem Ezzitouny; Raquel Lopez-Vilella; Miguel Angel Arnau; Luis Almenar; Luis Martínez-Dolz
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 5.  Where, when and how much: regulation of myelin proteolipid protein gene expression.

Authors:  P A Wight; A Dobretsova
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  The evolution of patient-specific precision biomarkers to guide personalized heart-transplant care.

Authors:  Mario C Deng
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2020-10-28

7.  Predictive Parameters of Decreased Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain at 1 Month After Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Jihye You; Jeong Jin Yu; Mi Jin Kim; Seulgi Cha; Jae Suk Baek; Eun Seok Choi; Bo Sang Kwon; Chun Soo Park; Tae-Jin Yun; Young-Hwue Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Usefulness of speckle tracking echocardiography and biomarkers for detecting acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Fernando Bacal; Marco S Lofrano-Alves; Márcio S M Lima; Maria C Abduch; Marcelo L C Viera; Hsu P Chiang; Juliana B C Salviano; Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa; Julia Tizue Fukushima; Joao C N Sbano; Wilson Mathias; Jeane M Tsutsui
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.