Literature DB >> 19360920

Addition of senna improves quality of colonoscopy preparation with magnesium citrate.

Stergios Vradelis1, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Yalda Sharifi, Otto Buchel, Satish Keshav, Roger W Chapman, Barbara Braden.   

Abstract

AIM: To prospectively investigate the effectiveness and patient's tolerance of two low-cost bowel cleansing preparation protocols based on magnesium citrate only or the combination of magnesium citrate and senna.
METHODS: A total of 342 patients who were referred for colonoscopy underwent a colon cleansing protocol with magnesium citrate alone (n = 160) or magnesium citrate and senna granules (n = 182). The colonoscopist rated the overall efficacy of colon cleansing using an established score on a 4-point scale. Patients were questioned before undergoing colonoscopy for side effects and symptoms during bowel preparation.
RESULTS: The percentage of procedures rescheduled because of insufficient colon cleansing was 7% in the magnesium citrate group and 4% in the magnesium citrate/senna group (P = 0.44). Adequate visualization of the colonic mucosa was rated superior under the citramag/senna regimen (P = 0.004). Both regimens were well tolerated, and did not significantly differ in the occurrence of nausea, bloating or headache. However, abdominal cramps were observed more often under the senna protocol (29.2%) compared to the magnesium citrate only protocol (9.9%, P < 0.0003).
CONCLUSION: The addition of senna to the bowel preparation protocol with magnesium citrate significantly improves the cleansing outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19360920      PMCID: PMC2668782          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.1759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  16 in total

1.  Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2,000 ml of balanced lavage solution (Golytely) and sennoside.

Authors:  Y Iida; S Miura; Y Asada; K Fukuoka; D Toya; N Tanaka; M Fujisawa
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1992-12

2.  High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli; Gianmichele Meucci; Gianni Imperiali; Giancarlo Spinzi; Enrico Strocchi; Vittorio Terruzzi; Giorgio Minoli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Colonic explosion during endoscopic polypectomy: avoidable complication or bad luck?

Authors:  D F G M Josemanders; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; A A van Sorge; P J Wahab; R A de Vries
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution.

Authors:  A Regev; G Fraser; G Delpre; A Leiser; A Neeman; E Maoz; V Anikin; Y Niv
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  V K Sharma; S K Chockalingham; E A Ugheoke; A Kapur; P H Ling; R Vasudeva; C W Howden
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Crystal Bernstein; Michael Thorn; Kelly Monsees; Rhonda Spell; J Barry O'Connor
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Virender K Sharma; Pat de Garmo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Addition of senna improves colonoscopy preparation with lavage: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  D J Ziegenhagen; E Zehnter; W Tacke; W Kruis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cristina C Rutherford; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03

2.  Volume of fluid consumption during preparation for colonoscopy is possibly the single most important determinant of bowel preparation adequacy.

Authors:  Yuri Gorelik; Eisa Hag; Tomer Hananya; Ronit Leiba; Yehuda Chowers; Elizabeth E Half
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 3.  Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation?

Authors:  Jae Seung Soh; Kyung-Jo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Low volume polyethylene glycol combined with senna versus high volume polyethylene glycol, which regimen is better for bowel preparation for colonoscopy? A randomized, controlled, and single-blinded trial.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Khaled Rahmani; Pardis Ketabi Moghadam; Saeed Abdi; Ali Jahanian; Mobin Fathy; Mahsa Mohammadi; Mehran Mahdavi Roshan; Meysam Olfatifar; Mohammad Reza Zali; Mohammad Reza Hatamnejad; Mohsen Rajabnia
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.