Literature DB >> 19359265

A genome-wide association study identifies a novel locus on chromosome 18q12.2 influencing white cell telomere length.

M Mangino1, J B Richards, N Soranzo, G Zhai, A Aviv, A M Valdes, N J Samani, P Deloukas, T D Spector.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telomere length is a predictor for a number of common age related diseases and is a heritable trait. METHODS AND
RESULTS: To identify new loci associated with mean leukocyte telomere length we conducted a genome wide association study of 314,075 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and validated the results in a second cohort (n for both cohorts combined = 2790). We identified two novel associated variants (rs2162440, p = 2.6 x 10(-6); and rs7235755, p = 5.5 x 10(-6)) on chromosome 18q12.2 in the same region as the VPS34/PIKC3C gene, which has been directly implicated in the pathway controlling telomere length variation in yeast.
CONCLUSION: These results provide new insights into the pathways regulating telomere homeostasis in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19359265      PMCID: PMC2696823          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.064956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


Telomeres are nucleoprotein structures capping and protecting the ends of chromosomes. Because of the “end replication problem”,1 telomeres shorten with each cell division and leucocyte telomere length has been shown to decrease with age at a rate of 20–40 base pairs per year.2 3 Telomere attrition is enhanced by inflammation and oxidative stress and short telomere length is an independent predictor of age related diseases such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, vascular dementia, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and Alzheimer’s disease.3 There is wide inter-individual variability in telomere length at birth and at subsequent ages. Both twin studies and intra-familial correlation analysis have identified a genetic influence (from 40% to 80%) on telomere length variation.4 5 Genome-wide linkage studies have mapped QTLs for this trait to chromosomes 12q12.225 and 14q23.2.4 More recently Mangino et al6 refined the chromosome 12q12.22 locus and described an associated polymorphism (rs2630778) in the BICD1 gene. To date, none of these findings have been replicated, possibly due to difficulties in measuring this trait in a large number of samples and due to lack of high correlation between the methods used to measure telomere length. Genome-wide association (GWA) analysis is a powerful tool for unlocking the genetic basis of complex traits and has recently provided novel insights into the genetic architecture of many common diseases and traits.7 8 We therefore undertook a GWA scan to identify common alleles that may influence telomere length. Our findings indicate that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2162440 and rs7235755 on chromosome 18q12.2 are associated with short telomere length in two independent datasets of European descent.

METHODS

We conducted a two stages GWA study on 2790 individuals from the UK Adult Twin Register (table 1), in which we evaluated 314 075 SNPs. The design and methodology of the GWA study is described in detail elsewhere.7 In brief, the discovery sample consisted of 1625 women from the St Thomas’ UK Adult Twin Registry,9 a large cohort of twins historically developed to study the heritability and genetics of diseases with a higher prevalence among women. The sample is not enriched for any particular disease or trait and is representative of the British general population.4 The replication cohort included 1165 subjects of both genders (table 1) from the UK Twin Registry who were unrelated to the individuals from the discovery sample.
Table 1

Characteristics of the 2790 individuals assessed for telomere length variation

Twins UK discovery cohortReplication cohortTotal sample
Subjects assessed for TRF162511652790
Age (years)*47.9 (12.6)49.2 (13.6)48.5 (13.1)
Males*48.1 (13.8)48.1 (13.8)
Females*47.9 (12.6)49.5 (13.5)48.5 (13.0)
Sex264264
Males16259012526
Females
LTL*7.02 (0.67)6.91 (0.68)6.97 (0.68)
Males*6.68 (0.69)6.68 (0.69)
Females*7.02 (0.67)6.98 (0.66)7.01 (0.67)

LTL, leucocyte telomere length.

*Values presented as mean (SD).

LTL, leucocyte telomere length. *Values presented as mean (SD). Leucocyte telomere length (LTL) was derived by using Southern blot analysis in duplicate to measure the mean terminal restriction fragment.10 The coefficient of variation for this measurement was 1.5%. Because all the individuals of the discovery cohort were females, telomere length was only adjusted for age. After adjustment, the trait was normally distributed in the sample. Genomic DNA was subjected to SNP genotyping via the Infinium assay (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA), using three fully compatible BeadChip microarrays (HumanHap300-Duo, HumanHap300 and HumanHap550), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. We excluded 733 SNPs that had a low call rate (⩽90%), 2704 SNPs that had Hardy–Weinberg p values <10−4, and 725 SNPs with minor allele frequencies <1%. We also removed subjects where genotyping failed for >2% of SNPs. We retained for the analysis 98.7% (314 075) of all available SNPs. Statistical analysis was carried out with MERLIN (version 1.1.2)11 using the score test (—fastAssoc), while accounting for family structure and twin zygosity.12

RESULTS

In the discovery sample (n = 1625) the strongest association was recorded for rs7374458 on chromosome 3 (5.20×10−6). We also identified 28 SNPs with a p value of ⩽10−4 and 316 SNPs with a p value of ⩽10−3. We visually inspected all the signal intensity plots of these SNPs and excluded the markers that had been miscalled (11.3%). Since none observed p values reached a genome-wide significance level after correcting for multiple testing, we adopted the conservative approach of selecting for replication only those polymorphisms with a p value <10−3 that were ≈100 Kb from other associated SNPs (p⩽1.0×10−2). Following these criteria, we identified 15 associated loci including a total of 41 SNPs with the p values for the lead SNPs ranging from 5.20×10−6 to 9.7×10−4 (table 2).
Table 2

Summary of the 15 loci analysed in discovery and replication cohorts

ChromosomeMarkerPositionAlleleβ GWA (SE)p Values GWAβ replication (SE)p Values replicationβ combined (SE)p Values combinedLocus
1p35.2rs751451431180643G−0.109 (0.025)1.30E−050.035 (0.030)3.30E−01−0.049 (0.019)1.45E−02PUM1*
1p35.2rs1240635531190045A0.089 (0.024)1.60E−040 (0.027)1.00E+000.05 (0.018)6.30E−03PUM1*
1q42.13rs238102227549771C0.08 (0.025)9.73E−050.027 (0.030)3.80E−010.059 (0.019)2.10E−03C1orf96§
1q42.13rs238099227575528A0.068 (0.023)2.58E−040.006 (0.030)8.60E−010.045 (0.018)1.70E−02C1orf96§
1q42.13rs7549589227586550A0.062 (0.024)1.38E−03−0.002 (0.034)9.70E−010.037 (0.018)5.70E−02C1orf96§
1q44rs3102458242606491A0.086 (0.028)2.10E−03−0.002 (0.033)1.00E+000.045 (0.022)2.40E−02C1orf100*
1q44rs3123710242611441A−0.076 (0.023)1.01E−030.015 (0.028)4.20E−01−0.041 (0.018)3.30E−02C1orf100*
1q44rs3003211242679607A−0.082 (0.025)8.40E−040.018 (0.030)4.70E−01−0.042 (0.019)3.30E−02ADSS*
2q22.2rs1376749143683862G−0.123 (0.032)1.10E−04−0.059 (0.040)1.49E−01−0.102 (0.025)6.20E−05ARHGAP15*
2q22.2rs12993643143749432G−0.093 (0.025)1.80E−04−0.013 (0.030)6.60E−01−0.062 (0.019)1.32E−03ARHGAP15*
2q22.2rs4662198143764197C−0.095 (0.028)6.00E−04−0.025 (0.035)4.70E−01−0.069 (0.022)1.50E−03ARHGAP15*
2q33.1rs1036533201105969G−0.157 (0.044)3.90E−04−0.048 (0.058)6.10E−01−0.115 (0.035)8.90E−04SGOL2†
2q33.1rs10497853201183402A−0.16 (0.045)4.30E−04−0.066 (0.057)2.50E−01−0.125 (0.036)1.03E−03AOX1*
3p22–p21.3rs185874038413376G−0.081 (0.023)3.40E−040.009 (0.028)8.30E−01−0.045 (0.018)1.34E−02XYLB*
3p22–p21.3rs440736638496429A−0.103 (0.023)8.80E−060.04 (0.033)2.60E−01−0.054 (0.019)6.50E−03ACVR2B*
3p22–p21.3rs737445838506215C−0.105 (0.023)5.20E−060.02 (0.028)4.80E−01−0.054 (0.018)4.00E−03ACVR2B‡
3p14.3rs377460153797933G−0.1 (0.024)3.10E−050.049 (0.028)8.60E−02−0.038 (0.019)3.80E−02CACNA1D*
3p14.3rs377460553805807G−0.1 (0.024)3.70E−050.053 (0.028)6.00E−02−0.035 (0.018)5.70E−02CACNA1D*
3p14.3rs377460953807943A−0.092 (0.024)1.20E−040.04 (0.028)1.48E−01−0.036 (0.023)7.40E−02CACNA1D*
4q31.21rs1907107143449084A0.073 (0.023)3.40E−04−0.009 (0.026)7.40E−010.034 (0.018)4.90E−02INPP4B*
4q31.21rs2635429143463006G0.067 (0.023)2.72E−04−0.02 (0.027)4.80E−010.029 (0.018)1.01E−01INPP4B*
4q31.21rs1497393143493161G−0.066 (0.023)1.48E−040.025 (0.028)3.70E−01−0.029 (0.018)1.10E−01INPP4B*
8p23.1rs48410678784655A0.139 (0.032)1.90E−050.01 (0.038)8.30E−010.088 (0.025)5.70E−04MFHAS1*
8p23.1rs117789138852300A0.069 (0.026)8.10E−030.057 (0.033)8.40E−020.067 (0.021)1.48E−03THEX1§
8p23.1rs112499439645273A−0.084 (0.029)3.60E−030.021 (0.033)5.20E−01−0.037 (0.022)7.80E−02TNKS*
8p23.1rs69897829647948G−0.076 (0.025)2.52E−04−0.003 (0.030)8.80E−01−0.048 (0.019)1.14E−02TNKS*
9q31.2rs1570504110094630C−0.107 (0.033)1.24E−030.016 (0.031)4.60E−01−0.055 (0.026)2.90E−02ACTL7B‡
9q31.2rs1535619110094886A−0.075 (0.031)1.50E−020.004 (0.037)9.10E−01−0.04 (0.024)8.30E−02ACTL7B‡
9q31.2rs7028041110096538G−0.109 (0.034)1.23E−030.017 (0.023)5.50E−01−0.05 (0.026)4.40E−02ACTL7B‡
13q31.3rs930192193432990A0.08 (0.031)5.25E−040.059 (0.037)1.06E−010.074 (0.024)2.20E−03GPC6*
13q31.3rs141573693444937G0.081 (0.031)3.70E−040.061 (0.043)1.60E−010.075 (0.026)3.50E−03GPC6*
14q22.2rs489884854266336A0.072 (0.024)4.53E−04−0.001 (0.028)8.00E−010.04 (0.018)2.90E−02SAMD4*
14q22.2rs657297154280838G0.1 (0.032)7.90E−04−0.021 (0.039)6.00E−010.052 (0.025)4.80E−02SAMD4*
14q22.2rs195735654288744G0.092 (0.029)9.65E−050.03 (0.033)3.90E−010.064 (0.022)2.70E−03SAMD4*
16q24.2–q24.3rs1721467782008463A0.111 (0.037)2.80E−03−0.074 (0.046)1.12E−010.038 (0.029)2.10E−01CDH13*
16q24.2–q24.3rs1186172282125547A0.124 (0.038)9.70E−04−0.098 (0.043)2.30E−020.021 (0.029)4.20E−01CDH13*
16q24.2–q24.3rs993400582137699G0.088 (0.027)9.20E−04−0.028 (0.031)3.80E−010.034 (0.020)8.50E−02CDH13*
16q24.2–q24.3rs1259884282145455A−0.059 (0.023)8.80E−03−0.007 (0.023)1.00E+00−0.038 (0.018)4.40E−02CDH13*
18q12.2rs216244033468004G−0.104 (0.029)2.50E04−0.119 (0.035)1.08E03−0.106 (0.022)2.60E06BRUNOL4§
18q12.2rs723575533470259G−0.104 (0.028)2.60E04−0.114 (0.035)2.00E03−0.103 (0.022)5.50E06BRUNOL4§
18q12.2rs221712733475628C−0.08 (0.025)1.30E−03−0.047 (0.035)2.20E−01−0.063 (0.020)2.10E−03BRUNOL4§

GWA, genome wide association; SE, standard error.

*Intron; †coding; ‡flanking 3′ UTR; §flanking 5′UTR.

Values in bold represent the two associated variants.

GWA, genome wide association; SE, standard error. *Intron; †coding; ‡flanking 3′ UTR; §flanking 5′UTR. Values in bold represent the two associated variants. These 41 selected SNPs were genotyped in the replication cohort (n = 1165) using Sequenom iPLEX (San Diego, California, USA) technology. Because the replication cohort included both males and females, LTL values were adjusted for both gender and age. After adjustment the trait was again normally distributed. To control for multiple testing, we used an SNP spectral decomposition method proposed by Nyholt13 and modified by Li and Ji.14 After spectral decomposition of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) matrices of the 41 analysed SNPs, the corrected threshold of statistical significance in the replication stage was estimated at p⩽2.1×10−3 which is a conservative correction for the number of independent SNPs tested in the replication sample. The results of the association analysis are reported in table 2 and show that we were able to replicate the association observed in the GWA sample for two markers, rs2162440 and rs7235755, both mapping to a 2.2 Kb region of chromosome 18q12.2. Since the discovery cohort included only females, we also performed a gender specific analysis on the replication population in order to test if the genetic variants may be associated with telomere lengths only for females. The result showed that for both SNPs the direction of the trend was consistent between genders in the replication cohort (rs2162440: −100 (44) base pairs (bp) for females and −140 (70) bp for males; rs7235755 −94 (42) bp for females and −138 (71) bp for males) and between females of the two cohorts (rs2162440: −104 (29) bp for female in discovery and −100 (44) bp for females in replication; rs7235755 −104 (28) bp for female in discovery and −94 (42) bp for females in replication). Although borderline (due to small sample size), p values were statistically significant for both SNPs in both genders in the replication cohort (rs2162440: females p = 0.012, males p = 0.046; rs7235755: females p = 0.02, males p = 0.049). The joint analysis of genotyped data from the two cohorts yielded combined p values of 2.60×10−6 (rs2162440) and 5.50×10−6 (rs7235755). Our analysis also indicated that the G alleles of both SNPs were associated with shorter telomeres (−106 (22) bp for rs2162440 and −103 (22) bp for rs7235755), extrapolating to an approximate 5 years of telomere erosion based on estimates of loss with age.

DISCUSSION

Although our results are unlikely to be artefacts because the identified SNPs were replicated in two independent cohorts, we do believe that our power for identifying association was reduced by the known limitations of the measurement technique.15 Therefore, we can only detect common variants. Indeed, it is likely that there are more loci with small genetic effect that we did not detect because of the stringent thresholds for statistical significance employed in this study. This would explain why we did not detect loci such as those previously identified on chromosome 12q12.22 and 14q23.2. According to NCBI build 36, the associated polymorphisms map to a 48 Kb LD block within a gene desert, between the Bruno-like 4 (BRUNOL4, NM_020180) and VPS34 (also known as PIK3C3, NM_002647) genes. The identified SNPs (or another variant present in the LD block) might be influencing the expression of either transcript through long range control, as has been demonstrated for other genes.16 This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the associated 48 Kb LD block lies in a highly conserved genomic segment. The two associated variants map ∼70 Kb away from BRUNOL4 and 4.3 Mb away from VPS34. BRUNOL4 is a member of the CELF/Bruno-like family, which encodes proteins bearing highly conserved RNA recognition motif. RNA binding proteins are important elements that control normal cell functions, regulating events such as RNA processing, mRNA transport, stability and translation. VPS34 is a component of the phosphoinositide (PI) 3 kinase family which includes proteins that regulate several aspect of the cell physiology.17 Interestingly, VPS34 yeast orthologue (Vps34) has been directly involved in the pathway which regulates telomere length variation.18 In conclusion, we provide evidence from two independent cohorts for a new locus on chromosome 18q12.2 associated with short telomere length in humans. These data provide new insights into the likely pathways and mechanisms regulating telomere length in humans.
  18 in total

Review 1.  The St. Thomas' UK Adult Twin Registry.

Authors:  Tim D Spector; Alex J MacGregor
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-10

2.  A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other.

Authors:  Dale R Nyholt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Obesity, cigarette smoking, and telomere length in women.

Authors:  A M Valdes; T Andrew; J P Gardner; M Kimura; E Oelsner; L F Cherkas; A Aviv; T D Spector
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Mapping of a major locus that determines telomere length in humans.

Authors:  Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Scott Brouilette; Massimo Mangino; John R Thompson; Peter Braund; Jenny-Rebecca Clemitson; Andrea Mason; Clare L Bodycote; Stuart M Raleigh; Edward Louis; Nilesh J Samani
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The yeast VPS genes affect telomere length regulation.

Authors:  Ofer Rog; Sarit Smolikov; Anat Krauskopf; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 6.  The epidemiology of human telomeres: faults and promises.

Authors:  Abraham Aviv
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Telomere length as an indicator of biological aging: the gender effect and relation with pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity.

Authors:  A Benetos; K Okuda; M Lajemi; M Kimura; F Thomas; J Skurnick; C Labat; K Bean; A Aviv
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon.

Authors:  A M Olovnikov
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-09-14       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Long-range control of gene expression: emerging mechanisms and disruption in disease.

Authors:  Dirk A Kleinjan; Veronica van Heyningen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex related to the yeast Vps34p-Vps15p protein sorting system.

Authors:  S Volinia; R Dhand; B Vanhaesebroeck; L K MacDougall; R Stein; M J Zvelebil; J Domin; C Panaretou; M D Waterfield
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-07-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Telomeres, early-life stress and mental illness.

Authors:  Samuel J Ridout; Kathryn K Ridout; Hung-Teh Kao; Linda L Carpenter; Noah S Philip; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price
Journal:  Adv Psychosom Med       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  Genetic variants implicated in telomere length associated with left ventricular function in patients with hypertension and cardiac organ damage.

Authors:  Matthias Huber; Andras Treszl; Markus Wehland; Ingke Winther; Irina Zergibel; Rona Reibis; Juliane Bolbrinker; Monika Stoll; Gilbert Schönfelder; Karl Wegscheider; Heinz Völler; Reinhold Kreutz
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Genetic variations associated with telomere length confer risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nasha Zhang; Yan Zheng; Jie Liu; Tiansui Lei; Yeyang Xu; Ming Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Telomere length in epidemiology: a biomarker of aging, age-related disease, both, or neither?

Authors:  Jason L Sanders; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  The association of telomere length and genetic variation in telomere biology genes.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Kai Yu; Peter Kraft; Immaculata De Vivo; David J Hunter; Jennifer Prescott; Jason Y Y Wong; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Richard B Hayes; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  1p34.2 rs621559 and 14q21 rs398652 leukocyte telomere length-related genetic variants contribute to glioma susceptibility.

Authors:  Yi-Dong Chen; Chao Lu; Jinyu Wei; Sichong Han; Herui Wang; Tao Jiang; Xiao-Guang Qiu; Ming Yang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Genome-wide association identifies OBFC1 as a locus involved in human leukocyte telomere biology.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven C Hunt; Masayuki Kimura; Shih-Jen Hwang; Wei Chen; Joshua C Bis; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Erin Smith; Andrew D Johnson; Jeffrey P Gardner; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Nicholas Schork; Jerome I Rotter; Utz Herbig; Bruce M Psaty; Malinee Sastrasinh; Sarah S Murray; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael A Province; Nicole L Glazer; Xiaobin Lu; Xiaojian Cao; Richard Kronmal; Massimo Mangino; Nicole Soranzo; Tim D Spector; Gerald S Berenson; Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Telomere length and recurrence risk after curative resection in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eric S Kim; Yuanqing Ye; Ara A Vaporciyan; Jinliang Xing; Maosheng Huang; Jian Gu; Jack A Roth; Scott M Lippman; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Telomere length and variation in telomere biology genes in individuals with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Elliott G Richards; Linh M Duong; Kai Yu; Zhaoming Wang; Richard Cawthon; Sonja I Berndt; Laurie Burdett; Salma Chowdhury; Kedest Teshome; Chester Douglass; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2010-11-23

Review 10.  The roles of senescence and telomere shortening in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Frej Fyhrquist; Outi Saijonmaa; Timo Strandberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.