Literature DB >> 19359089

Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery.

Karim Bensalah1, Allan J Pantuck, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Rodolphe Thuret, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Nicolas Mottet, Laurent Zini, Roberto Bertini, Laurent Salomon, Arnaud Villers, Michel Soulie, Laurent Bellec, Pascal Rischmann, Alexandre De la Taille, Raffi Avakian, Maxime Crepel, Jean-Marie Ferriere, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Thierry Dujardin, Frédéric Pouliot, Jérôme Rigaud, Christian Pfister, Baptiste Albouy, Laurent Guy, Steven Joniau, Hendrik van Poppel, Thierry Lebret, Thibault Culty, Fabien Saint, Amnon Zisman, Orit Raz, Hervé Lang, Romain Spie, Andreas Wille, Jan Roigas, Alfredo Aguilera, Bastien Rambeaud, Luis Martinez Piñeiro, Ofer Nativ, Roy Farfara, François Richard, Morgan Roupret, Christian Doehn, Patrick J Bastian, Stefan C Muller, Jacques Tostain, Arie S Belldegrun, Jean-Jacques Patard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is rare, and little is known about their natural history.
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors of cancer recurrence and related death in patients having a PSM following PN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Some 111 patients with a PSM were identified from a multicentre retrospective survey and were compared with 664 negative surgical margin (NSM) patients. A second cohort of NSM patients was created by matching NSM to PSM for indication, tumour size, and tumour grade. MEASUREMENTS: PSM and NSM patients were compared using student t tests and chi-square tests on independent samples. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to test the independent effects of clinical and pathologic variables on survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean age at diagnosis was 61+/-12.5 yr. Mean tumour size was 3.5+/-2 cm. Imperative indications accounted for 39% (43 of 111) of the cases. Some 18 patients (16%) underwent a second surgery (partial or total nephrectomy). With a mean follow-up of 37 mo, 11 patients (10%) had recurrences and 12 patients (11%) died, including 6 patients (5.4%) who died of cancer progression. Some 91% (10 of 11) of the patients who had recurrences and 83% of the patients (10 of 12) who died belonged to the group with imperative surgical indications. Rates of recurrence-free survival, of cancer-specific survival, and of overall survival were the same among NSM patients and PSM patients. The multivariable Cox model showed that the two variables that could predict recurrence were the indication (p=0.017) and tumour location (p=0.02). No other variable, including PSM status, had any effect on recurrence. None of the studied parameters had any effect on the rate of cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: PSM status occurs more frequently in cases in which surgery is imperative and is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, but PSM status does not appear to influence cancer-specific survival. Additional follow-up is needed. 2009 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19359089     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  50 in total

1.  [Partial nephrectomy. Rationale and limitations of an organ-preserving approach].

Authors:  J Casuscelli; C Gratzke; C G Stief; M Staehler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Transperitoneal in situ intraarterial cooling in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Stephan Kruck; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoendoscopic partial nephrectomy in single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) technique: early experience.

Authors:  Mathias Wolters; Florian Imkamp; Lucy Wohlatz; Stephan Jutzi; Christoph A von Klot; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Ute Walcher; Udo Nagele; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dean D Laganosky; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Kidney cancer in 2010: drugs, surgery and survival in RCC.

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma: current perspectives on technical issues.

Authors:  Javier González; José Manuel Cózar; Antonio Gómez; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Manuel Esteban
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses.

Authors:  Abimbola Ayangbesan; David M Golombos; Ron Golan; Padraic O'Malley; Patrick Lewicki; Xian Wu; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the first 100 cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Scott Tobis; Sriram Venigalla; Joy K Knopf; Emelian Scosyrev; Erdal N Erturk; Dragan J Golijanin; Jean V Joseph; Hani Rashid; Guan Wu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-10

10.  Oncological outcomes of patients with incidental pathological T3a stage small renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Sangjun Yoo; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.